Connect with us


January 1, Legal Battle Reignites Over Alleged Michael Jackson Sexual Abuse Cases



In a significant legal development, a California appeals court has rejuvenated lawsuits filed by two men who accused the late pop icon Michael Jackson of sexually abusing them over several years.

The three-judge panel from the 2nd District Court of Appeal in California, on Friday, ruled in favor of the lawsuits presented by Wade Robson and James Safechuck.

The court declared that these cases should never have been dismissed, emphasizing that the two Jackson-owned corporations might bear responsibility in safeguarding the alleged victims.

Both Robson and Safechuck contend that Jackson victimized them during their childhood years, a narrative that garnered widespread attention following the release of the 2019 HBO documentary, “Leaving Neverland.”

Recalling their alleged experiences, Robson mentioned that his acquaintance with Jackson began when he was only five, subsequently appearing in three of Jackson’s music videos.

He alleges that the abuse spanned seven years thereafter.

Conversely, Safechuck’s interaction with Jackson started at the age of nine during the shoot of a Pepsi commercial.

According to his lawsuit, Jackson then frequently called him, showered him with gifts, and initiated the alleged sexual abuse.

The duo initiated their legal actions against MJJ Productions and MJJ Ventures, the corporations where Jackson was the sole stakeholder, in 2013 and 2014.

Following Jackson’s demise in 2009, the cases were initially dismissed in 2017, citing that they exceeded the statute of limitations.

However, in 2020, a legislative change in California, which extended the time limit for childhood abuse victims to seek justice, enabled the reexamination of these cases.

Despite this revival, a Los Angeles judge in 2021 ruled that the two entities lacked any “legal ability” to monitor or influence Jackson’s actions, hence they were not liable for any alleged misconduct, leading to another dismissal.

In a significant twist, the recent California appeals court decision disputed the earlier judgment.

Like Middle America News? Get around the censors, sign up for our daily newsletters, and get stories like this directly to your inbox.

The court remarked, “A corporation that facilitates the sexual abuse of children by one of its employees is not excused from an affirmative duty to protect those children merely because it is solely owned by the perpetrator of the abuse.”

They further added that it would be inappropriate to negate any responsibility solely based on the corporation having a single shareholder.

Consequently, the verdicts favoring the corporations were reversed.

Reacting to this latest development, Vince Finaldi, the lawyer representing Robson and Safechuck, lauded the court’s ruling.

He affirmed that the prior verdicts were contradictory to California law and could have established a hazardous precedent, compromising children’s safety.

“We eagerly look forward to a trial on the merits,” he added.

In response, Jonathan Steinsapir, defending the Jackson estate, expressed their dismay over the reversal.

While communicating with The Associated Press, Steinsapir stated, “Two distinguished trial judges repeatedly dismissed these cases on numerous occasions over the last decade because the law required it.”

He continued to emphasize their unwavering belief in Jackson’s innocence, citing the absence of credible evidence and motives rooted in financial gains for the allegations.

Previously in July, during the case review, Steinsapir contended that it’s not reasonable to legally mandate employees to curb their superior’s actions.

He elaborated on the unrealistic expectations by saying, “It would require low-level employees to confront their supervisor and call them pedophiles.”

The cases now await a jury trial in Los Angeles, ensuring further deliberation and examination of these grave allegations.

As our loyal readers, we encourage you to share your thoughts and opinions on this issue. Let your voice be heard and join the discussion below.



Rubio Calls Out Military for Axing “Sound of Freedom” Showings



Marco Rubio

Once again, the establishment’s questionable decisions have left patriots scratching their heads. Senator Marco Rubio is in the spotlight, demanding answers and action after the cancelation of the box office hit, Sound of Freedom at the US Southern Command headquarters in sunny Doral, Florida.

To catch you up: the anti-child sex trafficking film was set to screen on two dates. But lo and behold, the military pulls the plug, echoing whispers from the mainstream media that the Christian-based thriller smelled too much like a “Q-Anon” conspiracy. Their ‘official’ reason? “Copyright infringement violations.” Sound fishy to anyone else?

Rubio, never one to be duped by the bureaucratic smoke and mirrors, fired back in a letter. “Let’s be clear,” Rubio essentially said, “The Department of Defense collaborates with movie companies all the time for free screenings on our military bases.” Heck, Elvis had advanced screenings on over 20 bases last year!

The senator also pointed out that the film’s distributor, Angel Studios, was happy to send someone over after the screenings to chat with the military folks and their families about any questions. A classy move.

But here’s the kicker: Rubio states that the producers and distributors of Sound of Freedom had given their nod of approval for the showing. So, any so-called “concerns” about copyright infringement are simply, to put it politely, bogus.

SOUTHCOM tried to dodge the ball, saying that their decision was based on “applicable laws and regulations,” and that troops could just watch the film in a local theater. But why the cancellation in the first place? Especially when Army Col. Emanuel Ortiz himself recognized the film’s importance, noting its aim to shed light on the dark world of transcontinental human trafficking.

This film, inspired by real-life hero Tim Ballard’s journey from CIA and Department of Homeland Security agent to forming Operation Underground Railroad (OUR) – an organization dedicated to fighting child sex trafficking – is no light matter.

So, we’re left asking: What’s the real reason behind the cancelation? Politics? Pressure? Whatever it is, with Rubio on the case, we’re sure to get some answers. Stay tuned, folks.

As our loyal readers, we encourage you to share your thoughts and opinions on this issue. Let your voice be heard and join the discussion below.


Continue Reading


Las Vegas Rapper Drops Clues in Music Video, Gets Arrested



microphone musician raper hip hop 5803205

In an astonishing twist of events, a Nevada-based rapper might have sung his way directly into police custody. Kenjuan McDaniel, a 25-year-old artist, allegedly included in his lyrics specific details of a 2021 crime, details so precise that they hadn’t been publicly disclosed, catching the attention of Las Vegas Metropolitan Police.

One particular lyric from McDaniel’s track “Fadee Free” made authorities sit up and take notice: “I be the reason why he’s dead, we still taunt him when he die, not the reason he’s dead, so celebrate the reason why his momma cry,” a warrant obtained by KVUU reported.

The song doesn’t stop there. Another line draws a haunting image, potentially linked to the tragic incident where a man met his end in his apartment following an apparent disagreement: “Parked the car, double back on feet, the smartest way to slide, drove in, double lock yo man, make sure you get yo bod’.”

The video showcases McDaniel and his associates undergoing terrifying transformations into skeletal, demonic figures.

What’s more chilling is that the rapper’s actions in the video were eerily “consistent with evidence at the scene,” according to the police.

What’s worth noting is that the police were clear in asserting that their investigation wasn’t solely based on the video.

“The facts gathered during the investigation were obtained separately from the music video,” they stated, emphasizing that the clip “further validated the results of the investigation.”

By mid-July, McDaniel’s video had already made its way to YouTube, and it didn’t take long for a detective to come across it. The similarities between the crime and the contents of the video were undeniable.

As the warrant highlighted, “Details provided by Kenjuan in his music video were not released to the public and would not be common knowledge.”

McDaniel reportedly appeared in court this past Thursday.

As our loyal readers, we encourage you to share your thoughts and opinions on this issue. Let your voice be heard and join the discussion below.


Continue Reading


Late Night Host is Getting Canceled After Staffers Speak Out



NBC Studios

The late-night television world is under turmoil as fresh allegations surface against none other than Jimmy Fallon, the face of “The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon”.

It appears the glossy, humorous, and seemingly fun façade may have been hiding some dark and disturbing secrets all along.

Fallon, at 48 years old, is facing intense scrutiny after several of his employees spoke out, painting a chilling picture of a “nightmare” workplace.

The gravity of the matter is made clear by one heart-wrenching confession from a former employee: “Mentally, I was in the lowest place of my life. I didn’t want to live anymore. I thought about taking my own life all the time.”

What’s perhaps more shocking are the specific incidents mentioned. One unnamed employee recalls a 2017 event, saying, “He couldn’t remember he had just crossed it out himself,” and went on to admit, “I was like, ‘Oh, my God, he [seems] drunk. He doesn’t know what he’s doing.”

These statements come as a poignant reminder of past reports about Fallon’s alleged out-of-control partying habits. In 2015, a bartender who served him noted, “He’s a mess.”

Staffers, it seems, have felt trapped in a world where saying “No” to Fallon was unheard of. They describe an environment where Fallon’s unpredictable mood swings became the weather vane for everyone’s day.

One former employee described the grim atmosphere, saying, “If Jimmy is in a bad mood, everyone’s day is f–ked. It was very much like, focus on whatever it is that you have to do because Jimmy’s in a bad mood, and if he sees that, he might fly off.”

The allegations not only speak of Fallon’s erratic and intimidating behavior but also suggest a persistent problem with alcohol during work hours.

Employees claim that they frequently sensed him being under the influence, even discerning alcohol on his breath during the workday, particularly between 2017 and 2020.

The alleged impact on the staff’s mental health is disheartening, with many describing an environment so toxic they had to resort to medication, therapy, or even suffered suicidal thoughts.

As one employee stated, “Writing for late night is a lot of people’s dream jobs, and they’re coming into this and it becomes a nightmare very quickly.”

Despite Fallon’s earlier claims, saying “I could never do a day-to-day job if I was drinking every night. That’s just kicking you when you’re down,” these latest allegations seem to paint a very different picture.

Notes on employees’ work such as “Are you OK? Seriously, do you need help?” and “Ugh, lame. What is going on with you?” further spotlight the severity of the alleged toxic environment.

As these revelations come to light, the question on everyone’s minds is clear: What’s next for “The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon”? And will the late-night world finally address the deep-seated issues that seem to be plaguing its glitzy studios?

At this juncture, representatives from “The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon” have remained silent. The world awaits their response.

As our loyal readers, we encourage you to share your thoughts and opinions on this issue. Let your voice be heard and join the discussion below.


Continue Reading