In a chilling episode that underlines the growing security concerns for political figures, a man posing as a federal agent was apprehended at a campaign event for presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in Los Angeles. Shockingly, Kennedy has been refused Secret Service protection by the federal government, even with consistent threats looming over his campaign.

The event, held at the renowned Wilshire Ebell Theatre, saw an unexpected disruption when the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) was alerted to an individual trying to pass himself off as a U.S. Marshal. This dubious character was armed and confidently sported “a badge on their lapel, a gun, and a shoulder holster,” as reported by Breitbart.

In an even more brazen attempt to blend in, the impostor proclaimed to be a part of the event’s security detail. Yet, when questioned further, none of the staff members could verify his claims. A note provided to the campaign, as witnessed by Breitbart, stated, “Male imp. fed. agent w/ handgun and ammo exposed. Claimed to be employed for event, but wasn’t recognized by sec.”

Thanks to the vigilance of the security team, a potentially hazardous situation was averted. Video footage captured the man’s arrest, where he can be seen being methodically handcuffed and led away by LAPD officers.

🚨#BREAKING: Armed Man with Loaded Guns has been Arrested for Impersonating RFK's Security team during at an Event⁰
📌#Losangeles | #California⁰⁰An armed man who was impersonating a U.S. marshal at a National Hispanic Heritage Month event that was taking place in Los Angeles… pic.twitter.com/f6vaT4EeNm

— R A W S A L E R T S (@rawsalerts) September 16, 2023

Following this unsettling incident, Kennedy released a statement expressing his gratitude towards the sharp-eyed security team from Gavin de Becker and Associates (GDBA).

He detailed, “The man, wearing two shoulder holsters with loaded pistols and spare ammunition magazines was carrying a U.S. Marshal badge on a lanyard and beltclip federal ID. He identified himself as a member of my security detail. Armed GDBA team members moved quickly to isolate and detain the man until LAPD arrived to make the arrest.”

Kennedy’s pleas for enhanced security, especially in light of his family’s tragic history, have gone unheeded. Both his father and uncle were tragically assassinated, yet the current administration has not granted him the Secret Service protection typically allotted to presidential candidates.

“I am the first presidential candidate in history to whom the White House has denied a request for protection,” Kennedy lamented.

As our loyal readers, we encourage you to share your thoughts and opinions on this issue. Let your voice be heard and join the discussion below.

Source

Paul Landis, a former Secret Service agent, who was a mere few steps away from President John F. Kennedy on the fateful day of his assassination, has broken his silence, raising new concerns about the long-debated “magic bullet” theory.

Landis, during his interaction with The New York Times and in his upcoming book, gave an account of that traumatic event which he has tried for decades to forget. He opined that if his memories from that day are accurate, the long-held “magic bullet” theory might need a serious revisit.

The year following the assassination of President Kennedy, the Warren Commission Report came out with the “magic bullet” theory. As per the report, a single bullet, fired at the president’s limousine, managed to injure both President Kennedy and Texas Governor John B. Connally Jr. This single-bullet theory was bolstered by the fact that a bullet was discovered on Connally’s stretcher at the Parkland Memorial Hospital.

But Landis, now 88, challenges this notion. According to him, he discovered the bullet, not on the stretcher, but on the limousine seat itself.

Landis recalls, “There was nobody there to secure the scene, and that was a big, big bother to me. All the agents that were there were focused on the president.” He added, “This was all going on so quickly. And I was just afraid that — it was a piece of evidence, that I realized right away. Very important. And I didn’t want it to disappear or get lost. So it was, ‘Paul, you’ve got to make a decision,’ and I grabbed it.”

Based on his memory, the bullet that he found had hit Kennedy in the back and hadn’t penetrated deeply. This bullet exited before the president was removed from the limousine. Landis’s revelations raise a significant question – was Lee Harvey Oswald the only shooter?

While conspiracy theories and questions about Oswald acting solo have persisted over the years, official records released by the National Archives have not provided any definitive evidence that counters the Warren Commission’s conclusions.

However, Landis’s recollections have been met with skepticism by some historians. They assert that his claims don’t align with their extensive research and the “cold hard facts” known about that day.

Author Gerald Posner argued, “Even assuming that he is accurately describing what happened with the bullet… It might mean nothing more than we now know that the bullet that came out of Governor Connally did so in the limousine, not on a stretcher in Parkland where it was found.”

Nevertheless, with a witness of Landis’s stature coming forward, the debate over the “magic bullet” theory is bound to reignite, leaving many to wonder once again about the events of that tragic day.

As our loyal readers, we encourage you to share your thoughts and opinions on this issue. Let your voice be heard and join the discussion below.

Source

The House Covid Subcommittee has pivoted its focus sharply towards the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in the wake of startling allegations from a “highly credible” whistleblower. This individual has claimed that the CIA provided financial incentives to its agents to challenge and counter the theory that the origin of Covid-19 was a laboratory in Wuhan, China.

Representative Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio), a leading figure in the Subcommittee, stated in a discussion with Fox News that plans are underway to invite Andrew Makridis, previously the CIA’s chief operating officer, for a voluntary, transcribed interview. The agency will also receive a subpoena for all internal correspondences and documentation connected to the global pandemic.

According to Wenstrup, “This alleged change of mind” is believed to have been orchestrated by Makridis. The intention behind this sudden pivot remains the core of the investigation, with Wenstrup emphasizing, “We’re also seeking documents and all the communications that took place amongst this team and outside of this team.”

🚨New testimony from a highly credible whistleblower alleges that former @CIA COO Andrew Makridis played a central role in the Agency’s COVID-19 investigation & possible origins cover-up.

Next step?

We are asking Mr. Makridis to sit for a voluntary transcribed interview. pic.twitter.com/p1IuCLPJj6

— Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic (@COVIDSelect) September 13, 2023

These shocking claims closely mirror the internal discussions between Dr. Anthony Fauci and a group of scientists. Reports suggest that initial observations leaned towards the virus having been potentially engineered in a lab. However, a subsequent report contradicted this by asserting the virus had natural origins. Wenstrup ardently posed the question, “Why was this done in the agency at CIA? And why was this done amongst these scientists led by Dr. Fauci or prompted by Dr. Fauci?”

The situation intensified on Tuesday when a joint letter, penned by Rep. Wenstrup and Rep. Mike Turner (R-OH), head of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, unveiled the whistleblower’s bombshell allegations. The letter, addressed to CIA Director William J. Burns, highlights that a “multi-decade, senior-level, current Agency officer” disclosed detailed information on the CIA’s probe into the virus’s origins.

The letter lays out that the whistleblower disclosed the formation of a “COVID Discovery Team” comprising seven agents possessing varied skills and significant scientific prowess. Notably, the whistleblower indicated that “six of the seven members of the Team believed the intelligence and science were sufficient to make a low confidence assessment that COVID-19 originated from a laboratory in Wuhan, China.” The seventh, and notably the most senior member, was the sole believer in the zoonotic origin of the virus.

However, the claim that truly sends shockwaves is the whistleblower’s assertion that a “significant monetary incentive” was offered to the other six team members to shift their stance.

In response to these allegations, both lawmakers have called on the CIA to release all relevant records pertaining to the COVID Discovery Team and communications shared with other significant agencies like the FBI, State Department, Health and Human Services, and the Energy Department. A failure to comply by September 26 may result in a subpoena.

As our loyal readers, we encourage you to share your thoughts and opinions on this issue. Let your voice be heard and join the discussion below.

Source