hillary clinton

September 8, 2022

Hillary Clinton Speaks Out: “I Can’t Believe We’re Still Talking About This”

1565: 1st permanent European settlement in the U.S. is founded at St. Augustine, Florida.

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton spoke out about her emails, saying she “had zero emails that were classified.”

“I can’t believe we’re still talking about this, but my emails,” Clinton wrote on Twitter. “As Trump’s problems continue to mount, the right is trying to make this about me again. There’s even a ‘Clinton Standard.'”

“The fact is that I had zero emails that were classified,” she continued.

Clinton’s remarks came as former President Donald Trump’s allies have compared her misuse of an email server to the documents recovered from his Mar-a-Lago residence.

The former Secretary of State said James Comey “admitted he was wrong after he claimed I had classified emails.”

“Trump’s own State Department, under two different Secretaries, found I had no classified emails,” Clinton said, adding: “That’s right: ZERO.”

“By contrast, Trump has hundreds of documents clearly marked classified, and the investigation just started.”

Sources: People | Axios

May 23, 2022

Report: Hillary Clinton Signed Off on Spreading False Trump-Russia Info

Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign manager Robby Mook said that the former Secretary of State signed off on sharing now-debunked collusion claims between former President Donald Trump and Russia.

Mook testified that Clinton campaign lawyer Marc Elias first briefed him “about the Alfa-Bank issue” in 2016. He said the campaign leadership quickly had a meeting about whether to share the information with the media, which they ultimately decided to do.

According to Mook’s testimony, other meeting attendees were campaign chairman John Podesta, communications director Jennifer Palmieri, and policy adviser Jake Sullivan — President Joe Biden’s current national security adviser.

When special counsel John Durham pressed Mook about who approved pushing the Alfa-Bank claims to the media, he said, “John and I were involved,” but “I discussed it with Hillary as well.”

“All I remember is that she agreed with the decision,” Mook said, adding, “she thought we made the right decision.”


Hillary Clinton signed off on sharing debunked Alfa-Bank claims with the media

March 16, 2022

Hillary Thanks Russia For ‘Lifetime Achievement Award’

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton mockingly expressed gratitude to Russia for imposing sanctions on her, thanking them for the “lifetime achievement award.”

Clinton was among the 13 high-profile US individuals that the Russian Foreign Ministry announced sanctions against, including President Joe Biden, his son Hunter Biden, Secretary of State Antony Blinken, and White House press secretary Jen Psaki.

“I want to thank the Russian Academy for this Lifetime Achievement Award,” Clinton wrote on Twitter.

The Russian Foreign Ministry said the 13 individuals were placed on a “stop-list,” saying the move was “an inevitable consequence of the extreme Russophobic course taken by the current US administration.”


Hillary Clinton thanks Russia for ‘Lifetime Achievement Award’ of sanctions

February 27, 2022

Hillary Blames Trump, GOP for Russian Aggression

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton repeatedly suggested that former President Donald Trump and GOP lawmakers were responsible for enabling Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression against Ukraine.

Clinton’s comments came during an appearance on MSNBC’s Morning Joe. The 2016 presidential hopeful accused Trump of “giving aid and comfort” to Putin amid the Kremlin’s invasion of Ukraine.

She also claimed Republicans were playing into Putin’s ambitions to “undermine democracy.”

“We have to also make sure that within our own country we are calling out those people who are giving aid and comfort to Vladimir Putin, who are talking about what a genius he is, what a smart move it is, who are unfortunately being broadcast by Russian media, not only inside Russia, but in Europe to demonstrate the division within our own country,” Clinton told Morning Joe host Mika Brzezinski.

Last week, Trump called Putin a “genius” and “very savvy” for his handling of Ukraine, adding the invasion wouldn’t have happened if he was president.

“This is heartbreaking, but it’s also dangerous, and I think it’s time for what’s left of the Republican Party that has any common sense not just to say, OK, go help defend Ukraine against Putin, but to stand against those people in politics and government, in the media and elsewhere in our own country who are literally giving aid and comfort to an enemy of freedom and democracy,” Clinton added.

“It can’t continue because it plays right into the ambitions of not just Putin, but also President Xi of China to undermine democracy, to literally divide and conquer the West without ever invading us, but by setting us against each other.”

Clinton said that since the “ascent of Trump,” too many Republicans had lost their “spine” with Putin.


Hillary Clinton repeatedly suggests Donald Trump, Republicans enabling Putin aggression during MSNBC interview

February 20, 2022

Hannity To Clinton: ‘Bring It On’

Fox News host Sean Hannity hit back at former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, daring her to sue after she rebuked the network over its coverage of special counsel John Durham’s Trump-Russia probe.

“It’s funny, the more trouble Trump gets into, the wilder the charges and conspiracy theories about me seem to get,” Clinton said.

Clinton criticized the “conspiracy theories about me” in Fox’s coverage of the Durham probe.

“Fox leads the charge with accusations against me, counting on their audience to fall for it again,” she said.

“They’re getting awfully close to actual malice in their attacks,” Clinton said.

“Actual malice” is a legal standard a public figure must show when bringing a libel case against a defendant. The Supreme Court has ruled that “actual malice” means a defendant made a defamatory statement “with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not.”

Her words did not go unnoticed by Hannity, who blasted the remarks on his show.

“It’s called discovery and it’s called depositions,” he said.

“Bring it on. Malice? Really? It’s called news. Hillary, we invite you to bring it on. It’s from a legal filing we quoted exactly from the filing that was put in federal court.”


Hannity slams Clinton over ‘actual malice’ comments: ‘Bring it on’

February 17, 2022

Hillary Breaks Silence on Bombshell Durham Filing

1865: Columbia, South Carolina, burns down during American Civil War

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton finally broke her silence on Special Counsel John Durham’s latest filing, rebuking former President Donald Trump and conservative outlets for “desperately spinning up a fake scandal to distract from his real ones.”

Clinton addressed the situation on Twitter, her first public statement on Durham’s Feb. 11 federal court filing, which alleged that her campaign paid a tech company to hack Trump Tower and White House servers in order to establish a fabricated connection between Trump and Russia.

Clinton tweeted: “Trump & Fox are desperately spinning up a fake scandal to distract from his real ones. So it’s a day that ends in Y.”

“The more his misdeeds are exposed, the more they lie,” she added.

She linked to a Vanity Fair article, writing: “For those interested in reality, here’s a good debunking of their latest nonsense.” The author of the piece, Bess Levin, “serves as a mouthpiece for the Democratic agenda,” according to The Daily Mail.

Meanwhile, the White House continues to deflect any questions related to the latest DOJ findings.

” I would point you – any questions about this – to the Department of Justice,” press secretary Jen Psaki said during her Wednesday press briefing.

When pressed on if “monitoring internet traffic” could be defined as spying, as detailed in Durham’s report, Psaki repeated her direction for reporters to take questions to the Justice Department.

Though mainstream media outlets have largely ignored or dismissed the filing, it captured the attention of Republican lawmakers.

“Durham’s recent revelations show what we knew all along – Hillary Clinton and her Democrat cronies actively spied on President Trump. No American should accept that a presidential candidate engaged in criminal activity and created a false scandal about their opponent to win an election,” Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ) said in a statement Wednesday.

“Hillary Clinton and the corrupt actors involved in this scheme should be prosecuted. And the media should uphold their duty and responsibility to report the truth.”


Hillary Clinton calls John Durham claims that she ‘spied’ on Trump ‘nonsense’ and claims the ex-President and media are trying to ‘spin up a fake scandal to distract from his real ones’

February 15, 2022

Bombshell Hillary Report ‘Bigger Than Watergate’

Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign hired a tech company to “infiltrate” servers at Trump Tower and the White House to link former President Donald Trump to Russia, according to a filing from Special Counsel John Durham.

Durham, the Department of Justice prosecutor investigating the origins of the FBI’s Trump-Russia probe, filed a motion on Feb. 11 on potential conflicts of interests of former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann’s representation.

Sussmann has been charged with making a false statement to a federal agent for allegedly telling then-FBI General Counsel James Baker that he was not working on Clinton’s behalf when he presented the agency with documents that purported to link the Trump Organization to a Kremlin-affiliated bank two months before the 2016 election.

Sussmann has pleaded not guilty.

But Durham’s motion alleged Sussmann “had assembled and conveyed the allegations to the FBI on behalf of at least two specific clients, including a technology executive (Tech Executive 1) at a U.S.-based internet company (Internet Company 1) and the Clinton campaign.”

Records showed Sussmann “repeatedly billed the Clinton Campaign for his work on the Russian Bank-1 allegations,” involving an investigative firm, a tech executive, cyber researchers, and numerous employees at internet companies.

According to the motion, in 2017, Sussmann provided “an updated set of allegations” on the Trump-Russia connection to another government agency.

The accusations included suspicious DNS lookups by Russia-affiliated IP addresses, which “demonstrated Trump and/or his associates were using supposedly rare, Russian-made wireless phones in the vicinity of the White House and other locations.”

The allegations “relied, in part, on the purported DNS traffic” that Tech Executive-1 and others “had assembled pertaining to Trump Tower, Donald Trump’s New York City apartment building, the EOP, and … [a] healthcare provider.”

But Durham said his office found “no support for these allegations,” and that the evidence Sussmann provided was incomplete and skewed.

Trump issued a statement saying Durham’s latest filing vindicated him.

“The latest pleading from Special Counsel Robert Durham provides indisputable evidence that my campaign and presidency were spied on by operatives paid by the Hillary Clinton Campaign in an effort to develop a completely fabricated connection to Russia,” the statement read.

“This is a scandal far greater in scope and magnitude than Watergate and those who were involved in and knew about this spying operation should be subject to criminal prosecution.”


Clinton campaign paid to ‘infiltrate’ Trump Tower, White House servers to link Trump to Russia: Durham

January 14, 2022

Dem Operatives Push for Hillary 2024 ‘Comeback’

Two Democratic operatives say a “perfect storm” brewing within their party is paving the way for “a political comeback for Hillary Clinton in 2024.”

Douglas Schoen, founder and partner of Schoen Cooperman Research, a polling and consulting firm whose past clients include Bill Clinton and Michael Bloomberg, and Andrew Stein, a former New York City Council president and state assemblyman, made their case in a new op-ed for the Wall Street Journal.

The pair claimed that between questions about President Joe Biden’s mental fitness and sinking approval ratings and Vice President Kamala Harris’ “unpopularity,” there is a “leadership vacuum” within the Democratic Party.

“[Clinton] is already in an advantageous position to become the 2024 Democratic nominee. She is an experienced national figure who is younger than Mr. Biden and can offer a different approach from the disorganized and unpopular one the party is currently taking,” they wrote.

“If Democrats lose control of Congress in 2022, Mrs. Clinton can use the party’s loss as a basis to run for president again, enabling her to claim the title of ‘change candidate.'”

The writers cited various recent instances that indicate Clinton has another presidential bid for office on her mind — including a “veiled jab at the Biden administration and congressional Democrats in an effort to create distance.”

“It means nothing if we don’t have a Congress that will get things done, and we don’t have a White House that we can count on to be sane and sober and stable and productive,” Clinton said during a recent interview.

Bill Clinton hinted at “his wife’s potential 2024 candicacy,” according to the piece, “referring to her in an interview with People magazine as ‘the most qualified person to run for office in my lifetime, including me.'”

“Given the likelihood that Democrats will lose control of Congress in 2022, we can anticipate that Mrs. Clinton will begin shortly after the midterms to position herself as an experienced candidate capable of leading Democrats on a new and more successful path,” the writers claimed.

The piece concluded: “If Democrats want a fighting chance at winning the presidency in 2024, Mrs. Clinton is likely their best option.”

The WSJ article is the latest op-ed to declare Clinton as the best choice for the Democrats in 2024. Last month, The Hill published a piece by Joe Concha entitled: “Hillary 2024? Given the competition, she may be the Dems’ best hope.”

“Hillary Clinton always seemed to believe the mantle of ‘First Female President’ was her birthright,” Concha wrote. “And given how pathetic the field is on the Democratic side with or without Joe Biden, she may just get a second chance at winning the office her husband so famously made infamous.”


Hillary Clintons 2024 Election Comeback

January 2, 2022

How a California Man’s Vote for Hillary Clinton Led to Life in Prison

A California man received a sentence of 35 years to life in prison after fatally shooting a woman and injuring her husband during an argument over the 2016 presidential election.

Jurors found that John Kevin McVoy Jr. intentionally used a firearm to kill Susan Garcia, 33. Prosecutor Irene Lee said that Garcia held her young son in her lap when McVoy opened fire.

McVoy and Susan’s husband, Victor Garcia, were members of a garage bang, Below the Faultline.

McVoy arrived at the Garcias’ home while they were hanging around the kitchen table with two friends while then-President Barack Obama’s farewell speech played on television.

The group engaged in a discussion about politics, and someone asked McVoy who he voted for. When McVoy said he voted for Hillary Clinton, Victor Garcia snapped his fingers, pointed to the door, and said, “Get the (expletive) out of my house.”

Prosecutors said McVoy then drew the revolver and fired a shot at Victor Garcia, hitting him in the head. He then turned the gun to Susan Garcia, who turned to shield their son as he fired. The bullet hit her in the left arm first and then penetrated her organs. She died inside the home.

Victor Garcia underwent two brain surgeries and now has metal plates in his head.


A Hillary Clinton vote leads to murder and life in prison for California man

December 19, 2021

Op-Ed Declares Hillary 2024 the Dems’ Best Hope

A recent opinion piece by Joe Concha for The Hill suggests that Hillary Clinton may be the best choice for the Democratic nominee amid President Joe Biden’s fledgling approval numbers and public standing.

In the piece titled “Hillary 2024? Given the competition, she may be the Dems’ best hope,” Concha cites a recent poll that found only 22% of Americans want Biden to run again in 2024.

When polling only Democrats, Biden doesn’t fare much better. Only 36% want Biden, and 44% want “someone else.”

Concha, a media and politics columnist, thinks that “someone else” might as well be Clinton. As many people on Capitol Hill speculate that Donald Trump will run for president in 2024, Concha listed reasons why other would-be Democratic contenders wouldn’t be the right choice.

“The Democratic bench is about as deep as the New York Jets’ these days. Vice President Harris? She’s at 28 percent approval, per USA Today,” Concha wrote. “Former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo? No longer governor and thoroughly disgraced. Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-CA)? He had to spend major time and resources just to avoid being ousted in deep-blue California during a recall election earlier this year.”

“If those are the options, why not Hillary? She’s 74 years old, which is like being bathed in the fountain of youth compared to Biden. And she’s still stunned — five years later — that she actually lost to Donald Trump. In fact, she sounds no different than Trump in constantly complaining about all the reasons she lost and that, well, the election was stolen by Trump and the Russians anyway. That type of rhetoric is a big no-no for Trump, but A-OK if Hillary (or Stacey Abrams) does it. Rules are rules.”

Based on Clinton’s recent behavior in the public eye, she may be gearing up to throw her hat in the ring. Clinton warned against Trump making another presidential bid in a new interview with Sunday TODAY.

“If I were a betting person right now, I’d say Trump is going to run again,” Clinton said. “But I want people to understand that this is a make-or-break point.”

“Are we going to give in to all these lies and this disinformation and this organized effort to undermine our rule of law and our institutions, or are we going to stand up to it?”

In the interview, Clinton tells Willie Geist that she was so certain of a 2016 victory over Trump, she didn’t prepare a concession speech.

Earlier this month, Clinton tearfully read her would-be victory speech publicly for the first time for a MasterClass called “Hillary Rodham Clinton Teaches The Power of Resilience.”

“Hillary Clinton always seemed to believe the mantle of ‘First Female President’ was her birthright,” Concha wrote. “And given how pathetic the field is on the Democratic side with or without Joe Biden, she may just get a second chance at winning the office her husband so famously made infamous.”


Hillary 2024? Given the competition, she may be the Dems’ best hope

Scroll to top