Connect with us

Latest News

January 1, Doctor Drops $100K to Loosen State’s Abortion Restrictions



Dr. Martin Haskell, notorious for creating the controversial intact dilation and extraction method, often referred to as “partial-birth abortion,” has splashed out a whopping $100,000 to push for laxer abortion regulations in Ohio.

Serving as the director of Women’s Med Center in Dayton, Haskell’s hefty donation was channeled to the Ohio Physicians for Reproductive Rights PAC this past March, as revealed by campaign finance documents scrutinized by the Washington Examiner.

What’s this sizable sum pushing for? The PAC is one of three powerhouses rallying behind a ballot initiative aiming to overhaul Ohio’s constitution.

Should they have their way, it would guarantee the right to not just abortions, but a range of “reproductive decisions, including but not limited to” contraception and fertility treatments.

But it doesn’t stop there. This proposed measure would dictate that Ohio can only intervene in abortions post-fetal viability unless the procedure is “necessary to protect the pregnant patient’s life or health.”

For some context, Ohio’s existing legislation permits abortions up to the first 21 weeks and six days of pregnancy.

It’s worth noting that while the 2019-signed Senate Bill 23 intended to outlaw abortions when a fetal heartbeat is detected—unless it’s a medical emergency—the Ohio Supreme Court has temporarily shelved that bill, pending a lawsuit’s resolution.

As our loyal readers, we encourage you to share your thoughts and opinions on this issue. Let your voice be heard and join the discussion below.




  1. Bill

    October 21, 2023 at 6:20 am

    The clown that took an oath to “do no harm” is spending cash to kill babies. He should be drummed out of the profession.

    • Jeanne Gray

      October 25, 2023 at 4:00 am

      I one hundred percent agree!!!!Obviously, killing babies is very profitable.

  2. grammer nazi

    October 21, 2023 at 11:02 am

    “laxer” is not a word just like “aborton” that was fixed on the one stupid lady’s poster. Use “more lax” next time.

  3. Tom

    October 21, 2023 at 11:27 am

    I am against abortion but more against anyone imposing their values on someone else. No one has the right to interfere with the choices someone else makes. Whether or not someone has a medical procedure done it is no one else’s business. My right to choose outweighs someone’s opinion about my choice.

    • Jeanne Gray

      October 25, 2023 at 4:03 am

      This is an absurd argument. If neighbor one doesn’t like neighbor two, does he have a right to kill him? After all, it’s his choice to do so. Think about this, and realize how specious your argument really is.

    • Don

      December 30, 2023 at 8:32 am

      Did you feel the same way when people were forced to get the covid shot to keep their jobs.

  4. Elwin P Valberg

    October 21, 2023 at 1:25 pm

    I am prolife. I know there are ways of preventing pregnancy which don’t create a trip to the hospital as an abortion does. That requires planning ahead so that pregnancy doesn’t happen unless that is what you want.

  5. Don

    December 30, 2023 at 8:29 am

    Its killing a baby. They try to make it sound not so bad. Reproductive rights.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *