Latest News
January 1, Trump Backs Greenland Amid Security Warnings
Wyatt’s Take
- Trump says Greenland is vital for America’s safety.
- Denmark pushes back, calls out takeover talk.
- Other world leaders weigh in, warning against intervention.
President Trump says Greenland is necessary for America’s protection, claiming Russian and Chinese ships are in the area.
He stressed the island’s importance and questioned Denmark’s commitment to defense.
“We need Greenland from the standpoint of national security,” Trump said. “Denmark is not going to be able to do it. I can tell you … They added one more dog sled.”
Trump hinted at possible action, telling a reporter, “Let’s talk about Greenland in about 20 days.” He also said, “The European Union needs us to have it as well.”
The Danish prime minister rejected Trump’s remarks, saying, “It makes absolutely no sense to talk about the U.S. needing to take over Greenland. The U.S. has no right to annex any of the three countries in the Danish Kingdom.”
Greenland’s leader, Jens-Frederik Nielsen, called the idea of annexation “disrespectful” and said, “Enough is enough. … No more fantasies about annexation.”
Prime Minister Frederiksen also urged the U.S. to “stop the threats against a historically close ally and against another country and another people, who have very clearly said that they are not for sale.”
Trump recently named Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry as special envoy to Greenland, with Landry agreeing the island should join the U.S. because of its location and resources.
Greenland’s minerals and its spot between North America and Europe make it valuable for defense and trade, especially as the U.S. works to reduce dependence on China.
Leaders in Britain and France voiced support for Denmark, saying Greenland should stay an autonomous territory and warning against outside pressure.
America has always looked out for its own first, but world powers are watching what happens next with Greenland.
Wyatt Matters
Americans want leaders to keep their country secure and defend their interests, but they also respect when others stand up for their homes. The heartland knows the value of strong borders and honest dealings.
-
Entertainment3 years agoWhoopi Goldberg’s “Wildly Inappropriate” Commentary Forces “The View” into Unscheduled Commercial Break
-
Entertainment2 years ago‘He’s A Pr*ck And F*cking Hates Republicans’: Megyn Kelly Goes Off on Don Lemon
-
Featured3 years agoUS Advises Citizens to Leave This Country ASAP
-
Featured2 years agoBenghazi Hero: Hillary Clinton is “One of the Most Disgusting Humans on Earth”
-
Entertainment2 years agoComedy Mourns Legend Richard Lewis: A Heartfelt Farewell
-
Latest News2 years agoNude Woman Wields Spiked Club in Daylight Venice Beach Brawl
-
Featured3 years agoFox News Calls Security on Donald Trump Jr. at GOP Debate [Video]
-
Latest News2 years agoSupreme Court Gift: Trump’s Trial Delayed, Election Interference Allegations Linger
David
January 6, 2026 at 6:05 am
I support Trump in many areas – and I can understand his security concern…BUT I am feeling very uncomfortable about his aggressive approach here…annexation appears to be a solid “NO” not only from Denmark, but MORE importantly, from Greenland itself… the compromise here would be to discuss the possibility of a US military base that includes protection for Greenland and to negotiate deals for mineral acquisitions (etc.)…
ladybug
January 8, 2026 at 1:38 pm
That is already possible according to longstanding agreements.
George A Gewehr
January 6, 2026 at 7:43 am
There is a book out now, titled, “Fire and Ice”. If you’re interested in this Greenland problem, I suggest anyone to read it. It is exactly about this same problem back during WW 2 and the Germans then and Nazi problem. Does anyone know that the Nazi’s had a weather station on the east coast of Greenland and the USA had one on west coast of Greenland during WW 2. Can you guess the outcome?