Latest News
January 1, Supreme Court Decision Sparks Medicaid Funding Controversy

The Supreme Court has made an important decision for folks in South Carolina. They said it’s okay for the state to stop Medicaid money from going to Planned Parenthood. This means South Carolina doesn’t have to use taxpayer money to support a group that provides abortions, which many people strongly disagree with.
The decision passed with a 6-3 vote, with Justice Neil Gorsuch saying that the law doesn’t really let patients sue over this issue. States like South Carolina can choose which health care providers join Medicaid, just like they can keep out doctors who have done bad things.
Governor Henry McMaster is happy about the ruling. He believes that taxpayer money shouldn’t go to things that go against people’s beliefs, like abortion. Seven years ago, South Carolina took action to uphold life and state values, and now they’ve won.
Now, other states led by Republicans might do the same thing — cutting off funds to Planned Parenthood, which they feel shouldn’t be getting taxpayer money, especially since Roe v. Wade was overturned a few years back.
Pro-Life voices are saying Planned Parenthood should be exposed for what they really are. Some argue that they have problems like unsafe clinic conditions, and they’re more about politics than helping people. They’re saying the end of Planned Parenthood’s taxpayer support is near.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer isn’t happy with the court’s choice. He blames Republicans for what’s happening, saying they helped make the court the way it is and now it’s affecting women’s health care in a negative way. But for many in favor of this ruling, it’s a victory for life and freedom of choice on where taxpayer money goes.
Wyatt Matters!
The Supreme Court’s recent decision means South Carolina can now choose where Medicaid funds go, and they decided not to send these funds to Planned Parenthood. This is because many people in the state don’t agree with Planned Parenthood providing abortions. By making this decision, the state is upholding beliefs that taxpayer money shouldn’t support things that a lot of people find wrong. This shows that the government wants to respect the views of its citizens when it comes to sensitive topics like abortion.
Governor McMaster and others are celebrating this choice because they believe it’s a victory for their values and for the protection of life. They feel taxpayer money should only go to health service providers that align with these beliefs. The decision reflects a broader movement; since Roe v. Wade was overturned, states have more power to decide on these issues. This particular ruling could inspire similar actions in other states as they rethink where Medicaid funds should go.
Opponents of the ruling, like Chuck Schumer, worry about its effects on women’s health care. They claim it limits options and harms access to services by removing funding from Planned Parenthood. However, those in favor argue it’s about freedom of choice for the use of taxpayer dollars and ensuring funding only goes to providers that match their community’s values. For them, the decision is seen as a positive step towards aligning state actions with the beliefs and the wishes of its people.
As our loyal readers, we encourage you to share your thoughts and opinions on this issue. Let your voice be heard and join the discussion below.

-
Entertainment2 years ago
Whoopi Goldberg’s “Wildly Inappropriate” Commentary Forces “The View” into Unscheduled Commercial Break
-
Entertainment1 year ago
‘He’s A Pr*ck And F*cking Hates Republicans’: Megyn Kelly Goes Off on Don Lemon
-
Featured2 years ago
US Advises Citizens to Leave This Country ASAP
-
Featured2 years ago
Benghazi Hero: Hillary Clinton is “One of the Most Disgusting Humans on Earth”
-
Entertainment1 year ago
Comedy Mourns Legend Richard Lewis: A Heartfelt Farewell
-
Featured2 years ago
Fox News Calls Security on Donald Trump Jr. at GOP Debate [Video]
-
Latest News1 year ago
Nude Woman Wields Spiked Club in Daylight Venice Beach Brawl
-
Latest News1 year ago
Supreme Court Gift: Trump’s Trial Delayed, Election Interference Allegations Linger
Todd
June 29, 2025 at 8:59 am
This is good and fair. To those oppose it, I ask, “Do you want tax dollars to fund Christian education?”.
Donald Kosloff
June 29, 2025 at 9:51 am
The Supreme Court did NOT make a decision for the citizens of South Carolina. It allowed the citizens of South Carolina to make their own decision
bill ganas
June 29, 2025 at 10:33 am
I am Not for abortion……But , the silver lining is , ‘ most of the ones that need medicare money for an abortion vote for demacratez , and so will the newborn…’ So , is anything that eliminates a vote for the opposition really that bad ?
Brian Heinz
June 29, 2025 at 10:33 am
Why should tax payers have to fund abortions if you want to kill your child why should we have to pay for it. Your doing the killing so you should do the paying.
Leslie
June 29, 2025 at 10:47 am
…or simply don’t get pregnant to begin with if you’re not ready to have a child. Adoption is age-old alternative for an unwanted pregnancy.
MiniBooger
June 29, 2025 at 10:55 am
The government shouldn’t fund ANY elective ‘health care’.
Logical Mind
June 29, 2025 at 11:58 am
Killing babies has NOTHING to do with “women’s Health”
After all, the left doesnt even know what a woman is