Latest News
January 1, SCOTUS Emergency: Rogue Judges Try Blocking Critical White House Security Upgrades
Wyatt’s Take
- Two lower courts just told the President of the United States he can’t upgrade security at his own house — the White House — even as Iran openly plots assassination attempts and drone threats multiply
- A radical activist group is using the courts to micromanage what the Commander-in-Chief can build to protect himself and our national security operations, creating dangerous delays while enemies watch
- Chief Justice Roberts now holds America’s security in his hands — he must immediately stay this absurd ruling and let construction continue before it’s too late
Two lower courts just made one of the most dangerous decisions in recent memory. They’re telling President Trump he can’t finish critical security upgrades to the White House East Wing — a structure that’s been outdated since World War II.
U.S. District Judge Richard Leon and the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals have created a nightmare construction schedule that micromanages every detail of what can and cannot be built at the Executive Mansion. They’re treating presidential security like a zoning board hearing.
The old East Wing was built in 1902 and expanded in 1942 when FDR added underground facilities including the Presidential Emergency Operations Center. That “emergency center” is now 84 years old. In an era of hypersonic missiles and sophisticated drone swarms, that’s beyond reckless — it’s suicidal.
Judge Neomi Rao — one of the sharpest legal minds in America — issued a blistering dissent to the circuit court’s rambling opinion. The Department of Justice has now asked Chief Justice John Roberts to stay the lower court orders and let construction proceed.
Roberts requested a response from the National Trust for Historic Preservation, the activist group driving this lawsuit, due by noon Tuesday, August 18, 2026.
The Chief Justice needs to act immediately. Not only are there obvious “standing issues” — does an outside group really have authority to dictate presidential security? — but the core question is presidential authority over the Executive Mansion and national security facilities.
This isn’t complicated. Any president must have full authority over their home, office, and the national security facilities attached to those structures. That includes the White House and places like Camp David.
To ignore rapidly evolving threats in today’s world defies common sense. Judge Rao’s dissent is persuasive, but the answer should be even simpler: The idea that outside groups can veto changes to White House security facilities is ridiculous and dangerous.
The Constitution established three separate but equal branches. The Executive Branch — which names the president Commander-in-Chief of the military — includes the necessary and proper powers to maintain facilities for executing the laws and commanding the military.
The backdrop here matters. We’ve seen repeated assassination attempts against this president and others. Surveillance technology advances daily and must be countered. The threats from drones and hypersonic missiles have exploded over the past three years.
Presidents shouldn’t be blocked from securing their homes and command centers from a threat matrix that has soared off the charts.
Remember 9/11. Vice President Dick Cheney was physically lifted from his West Wing office by Secret Service. Where do you think they took him? The Blue Room for tea?
What do you imagine is being built below the new East Wing right now?
Now imagine the consequences if a state sponsor of terror successfully targets the White House because necessary defenses weren’t in place — all because of this absurd litigation.
“Trump Derangement Syndrome” has infected even the judiciary. While the hard left and terror-based regimes would love to see a Commander-in-Chief denied authority over his command structures, the Supreme Court must move quickly to end this circus.
Most of America wants to enjoy the rest of summer. But that’s not what would-be assassins and the Iranian Revolutionary Guard are doing this August.
The Supreme Court must act. Common sense about the Constitution demands the stay be issued and construction resumed according to the design the president approved after consulting with the Secret Service and Pentagon.
America’s enemies don’t take vacations. Neither can our national security infrastructure.
Wyatt Matters
Working Americans understand something simple that ivory tower judges apparently don’t: when someone threatens your family, you protect your home. When enemies plot against your country, you fortify your defenses. The idea that environmental activists can veto the Commander-in-Chief’s security upgrades while Iran plans attacks is the kind of elite insanity that drives heartland voters crazy. Our Supreme Court needs to remember it works for the American people — not radical special interest groups with legal degrees.
-
Entertainment3 years agoWhoopi Goldberg’s “Wildly Inappropriate” Commentary Forces “The View” into Unscheduled Commercial Break
-
Entertainment3 years ago‘He’s A Pr*ck And F*cking Hates Republicans’: Megyn Kelly Goes Off on Don Lemon
-
Featured3 years agoUS Advises Citizens to Leave This Country ASAP
-
Featured3 years agoBenghazi Hero: Hillary Clinton is “One of the Most Disgusting Humans on Earth”
-
Latest News2 years agoNude Woman Wields Spiked Club in Daylight Venice Beach Brawl
-
Entertainment2 years agoComedy Mourns Legend Richard Lewis: A Heartfelt Farewell
-
Featured3 years agoFox News Calls Security on Donald Trump Jr. at GOP Debate [Video]
-
Latest News2 years agoSupreme Court Gift: Trump’s Trial Delayed, Election Interference Allegations Linger