Latest News
January 1, Supreme Court Split Sparks Alarm Over Counselor Free Speech

Wyatt’s Take
- In an 8-1 ruling, the Supreme Court said Colorado cannot punish a Christian counselor for speaking freely.
- Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented, warning the decision could have major consequences for healthcare regulation.
- The ruling bolsters free-speech protections for professionals facing pressure to conform to state-approved ideology.
Justice Jackson warned about the long-term implications of this victory for free speech.
“Ultimately, because the majority plays with fire in this case, I fear that the people of this country will get burned,” Jackson wrote in her solo dissent.
Justice Elena Kagan fired back at the lone dissenter for trying to rewrite established law to fit a political narrative.
“JUSTICE JACKSON’s dissenting opinion claims that this is a small, or even nonexistent, category,” Kagan wrote regarding viewpoint-neutral laws.
The ruling confirms that the government cannot ban talk therapy just because the state disagrees with a counselor’s traditional values.
This decision protects professionals from being forced to affirm gender confusion against their conscience and common sense.
Wyatt Matters
Common sense prevails when the highest court stops the government from bullying people who believe children should be protected from radical agendas. This ruling ensures that the state cannot silence the truth just to please the woke mob.
-
Entertainment3 years agoWhoopi Goldberg’s “Wildly Inappropriate” Commentary Forces “The View” into Unscheduled Commercial Break
-
Entertainment2 years ago‘He’s A Pr*ck And F*cking Hates Republicans’: Megyn Kelly Goes Off on Don Lemon
-
Featured3 years agoUS Advises Citizens to Leave This Country ASAP
-
Featured3 years agoBenghazi Hero: Hillary Clinton is “One of the Most Disgusting Humans on Earth”
-
Entertainment2 years agoComedy Mourns Legend Richard Lewis: A Heartfelt Farewell
-
Latest News2 years agoNude Woman Wields Spiked Club in Daylight Venice Beach Brawl
-
Featured3 years agoFox News Calls Security on Donald Trump Jr. at GOP Debate [Video]
-
Latest News2 years agoSupreme Court Gift: Trump’s Trial Delayed, Election Interference Allegations Linger
Joann
April 6, 2026 at 10:33 am
What “long-term implications” is she worried about? It’s FREE SPEECH! When a SUPREME COURT JUSTICE WANTS TO DENY FREE SPEECH – SHE NEEDS TO BE OFF THE COURT!!
Russ
April 6, 2026 at 7:13 pm
I agree with Joann 100%. Justice Brown Jackson is a nut. Even her liberal court mates struggled to understand her dissenting opinion.