Connect with us

Latest News

January 1, Powell Shows Up At Supreme Court Firestorm

Published

on

Wyatt’s Take

  • Fed Chair Powell is set to watch the Supreme Court take up whether Trump can fire Fed governor Lisa Cook.
  • Trump isn’t happy with the Fed’s refusal to lower interest rates and has suggested action against Powell.
  • A new Justice Department probe questions Powell about Federal Reserve spending.

Jerome Powell, leader of the Federal Reserve, plans to attend the Supreme Court session this week about the firing attempt on governor Lisa Cook. This move signals strong support for Cook, something court watchers don’t see often.

The Supreme Court will be deciding if President Trump can remove Cook, after he said last August he’d like her out. Powell’s presence at the hearing is confirmed by anonymous sources.

Trump has criticized Powell and suggested firing him too, mainly because the Fed won’t lower interest rates. Lately, however, he has called such a firing “highly unlikely.”

The Justice Department is now investigating if Powell misled Congress about the cost and scope of giving the Federal Reserve building a facelift.

Powell pushed back fast, with a video message that called the criminal probe payback for resisting the pressure to cut rates.

Read more at Just the News

Wyatt Matters

This clash is about who really calls the shots over our money and who takes the heat when things cost more. Working folks can’t afford games with their paychecks on the line.

1 Comment

  1. Dan Meyer

    January 20, 2026 at 1:51 pm

    ‘Independent agency’ is the argument Powell, etal, claim for the Federal Reserve. If requiring massive amount of taxpayers’ money is an indication. Then, the Reserve is anything BUT ‘independent’. Therefore, the POTUS would have authority to make personnel decisions.

    To provide written estimates for any work, regardless of scale, there IS an understanding that the bottom line has a certain degree of uncertainty. To make more than a $700 million overrun on costs is clearly wrong, unacceptable. Unforeseen labor, material costs,… notwithstanding, contractors are expected to stand by their proffers bids. They are ‘professionals’. When the client, the Reserve allows these overruns Without altering the original agreements, continue to pay Without scrutiny, THAT is negligent. As a taxpayer, I expect restitution for the flagrant disregard of how OUR monies are spent.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

1 Comment


Wyatt Porter is a seasoned writer and constitutional scholar who brings a rugged authenticity and deep-seated patriotism to his work. Born and raised in small-town America, Wyatt grew up on a farm, where he learned the value of hard work and the pride that comes from it. As a conservative voice, he writes with the insight of a historian and the grit of a lifelong laborer, blending logic with a sharp wit. Wyatt’s work captures the struggles and triumphs of everyday Americans, offering readers a fresh perspective grounded in traditional values, individual freedom, and an unwavering love for his country.




Trending