Featured
January 1, Town Grapples with Drop Boxes as Election Fraud Verdict Looms
"Ballot Drop Box at Snohomish County Campus" by SounderBruce is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0 
.
A judge in Bridgeport, Connecticut is set to decide the fate of the Democrat mayoral primary after irrefutable evidence emerged of a city employee stuffing a drop box with absentee ballots in the dead of night.
The primary, which relied on 251 absentee ballots, was determined by this fraudulent activity.
This case has put towns across Connecticut on alert as they confront their own unsecured and unmonitored drop boxes. The implications of this conundrum could be far-reaching, especially with the 2024 election on the horizon.
The use of drop boxes in Connecticut, much like in other states, was implemented illegally by the Secretary of State in 2020. It is worth noting that the Secretary of State does not possess the legal authority to unilaterally change election laws; that power rests solely with state legislatures.
Despite the questionable nature of their implementation, drop boxes were made permanent by Connecticut’s Democrat-controlled legislature after the 2020 election.
It seems that winning a presidency that they should have lost by a wide margin was not enough; they had to ensure drop boxes became a permanent fixture in future elections.
Although it was recommended that the drop boxes be placed in secure and well-lit locations with round-the-clock camera monitoring, the presence of cameras remains optional for cities and towns in Connecticut.
The ongoing civil trial in Bridgeport has now brought this issue to the forefront of discussions throughout the state.
Surveillance footage revealed a city employee named Wanda Geter-Pataky stuffing stacks of ballots into the drop box outside her office at 5:41 a.m., a week before the mayoral primary in September. She made multiple trips to unload the fraudulent ballots.
When called to testify, she invoked her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and refused to answer any questions under oath.
While challenger John Gomes won based on the number of in-person votes on the primary election day, he lost when the absentee ballots from the drop boxes were counted. Incumbent Mayor Joe Ganim emerged victorious by a margin of 251 votes. It is worth noting that Wanda Geter-Pataky is an outspoken and obnoxious partisan supporter of Mayor Ganim.
In response to this scandal, Gomes is suing to have the primary election awarded directly to him, thus nullifying Ganim’s victory through drop box stuffing. Alternatively, he is pushing for a redo of the election, but with stricter safeguards against cheating.
Currently, there are 250 drop boxes spread across Connecticut. Larger towns like Bridgeport have three or four drop boxes, while smaller towns have one or two. Given that cameras are optional, many smaller towns are opting out to save costs.
The Bridgeport case has alerted towns across the state, despite the Democrat-controlled legislature’s insistence that their elections are secure. In Enfield, the city council has decided to install cameras to monitor all three of its drop boxes in response to the Bridgeport incident.
Meanwhile, Windsor has kept its drop boxes in front of existing cameras, eliminating the need for additional taxpayer expense.
Republican lawmakers in the Connecticut state legislature are raising valid concerns about the necessity of drop boxes. The Democrats’ desire for drop boxes and mail-in ballots is rooted in their desire to cheat in elections.
The only reason Connecticut is currently discussing drop boxes is due to the blatant cheating caught on camera during a Democrat primary, which the courts are now reviewing.
The implications of this case are enormous. If the judge invalidates the Bridgeport primary, it will provide a solid basis for statewide and even federal bans on drop boxes. As the largest city in Connecticut, if elections can be stolen via drop boxes in Bridgeport, it raises the question of whether the same could happen anywhere else. Even with 24/7 surveillance, ballot box-stuffing still occurred in Bridgeport.
We eagerly await the judge’s decision in this case and will keep you informed once a ruling is issued.
As our loyal readers, we encourage you to share your thoughts and opinions on this issue. Let your voice be heard and join the discussion below.
-
Entertainment1 year agoWhoopi Goldberg’s “Wildly Inappropriate” Commentary Forces “The View” into Unscheduled Commercial Break
-
Entertainment12 months ago‘He’s A Pr*ck And F*cking Hates Republicans’: Megyn Kelly Goes Off on Don Lemon
-
Featured1 year agoUS Advises Citizens to Leave This Country ASAP
-
Featured1 year agoBenghazi Hero: Hillary Clinton is “One of the Most Disgusting Humans on Earth”
-
Entertainment10 months agoComedy Mourns Legend Richard Lewis: A Heartfelt Farewell
-
Featured1 year agoFox News Calls Security on Donald Trump Jr. at GOP Debate [Video]
-
Latest News10 months agoSupreme Court Gift: Trump’s Trial Delayed, Election Interference Allegations Linger
-
Latest News10 months agoNude Woman Wields Spiked Club in Daylight Venice Beach Brawl
Donald R Cook
November 1, 2023 at 7:13 pm
drop boxes are Not needed. If the voters are too Lazy to go to the Polls, they should Not Vote.
Gary Lasister
November 1, 2023 at 7:18 pm
Lets all pray that the State and City officials wake up and stop these illegial drop boxes! The voters in Madd. deserve better as well do all Americans
Ray Hoven
November 1, 2023 at 7:19 pm
I will not even vote if the drop boxes are still around!!!!!! If you would like to know of a MUCH safer way to do the voting PLEASE contact Me now so we can still have time to do something about it—-AND I WILL GIVE YOU A MUCH SAFER WAY FOR EVERYONE TO VOTE!!!!!!
Ray
Ray
November 1, 2023 at 7:24 pm
YOU SHOULD NOT PUT MY WHOLE NAME OUT THERE FOR EVERYONE TO SEE ONLY A FIRST NAME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
John F Edwards
November 1, 2023 at 7:48 pm
Why was this election not refused and required to be upheld? We have lost America and need to reclaim it. The Federal Law Organizations and the military need to say hell no or be tied to them and suffer the consequences of this illegal BS.
JCE
November 1, 2023 at 7:58 pm
If there is a way to cheat the Democrats will find it and use it to the max!
Douglas Pewtress
November 1, 2023 at 8:15 pm
Welcome to th Communist states of America
Robert Richey
November 1, 2023 at 9:07 pm
If a person can go to a drop box they should be able to go to their designated polling place.
Brian Pannebecker
November 1, 2023 at 10:43 pm
It’s SOOO obvious, Democrats want unmanned ‘drop-boxes’ for one reason , to commit fraud.
Republicans DON’T because they only want to vote once, period!
Bottom lin, Democrats want to waive voter – IS, and waive the signature verification requirement . Why?
Why else, so they can CHEAT!!
Jeff
November 2, 2023 at 5:09 am
Voter I.D. now!! Drop boxes and rank choice voting should be illegal.
Nate
November 2, 2023 at 9:21 am
Democrat Party “Cheat Boxes”!
Bob O'Brien
November 2, 2023 at 11:39 am
To continue to allow these fraud fattened drop boxes is completley asinine. Only left leaning democrats allow this fraud to continue.
Mel Friedman
November 2, 2023 at 2:18 pm
Drop boxes equals fraud. Remove them permanently. Require ID for ALL voting!!
Henry L
November 3, 2023 at 6:39 am
ID all voters, NO more mail, only for the military out of the States, citizens living out of the country, vote at the Embassy they are registered at.
Let’s return the U S A to what it was, no more BS
Rick
November 3, 2023 at 6:57 am
Drop boxes encourage voter fraud. Get rid of all of them. A Dem ploy to alter elections.
RH
November 3, 2023 at 4:23 pm
Voting should be for 3 days to have time for ALL PEOPLE TO CAST THEIR BALLOTS ____IN PERSON!!!!!
NO COUNTING OF ANY BALLOTS UNTIL——-ALL PEOPLE HAVE VOTED!!!!!!!!!