Latest News
January 1, Trump’s White House Ballroom Plan Hits a Legal Wall
Wyatt’s Take
- A federal judge blocked President Trump’s plan to move ahead with a new White House ballroom without congressional approval.
- The ruling pauses further work at the East Wing site while the administration prepares to appeal.
- Trump says the privately funded project is meant to improve security and modernization at the People’s House.
A federal judge just stepped in to stop President Trump from upgrading the White House with a new, privately funded ballroom. D.C. Judge Richard Leon ruled that the administration can’t proceed with the project without getting a green light from Congress first.
The ruling puts a total freeze on any further digging or construction at the old East Wing site for now. Trump isn’t backing down and already has his legal team filing appeals to keep the work moving forward.
The President pointed out that the new facility would include critical security upgrades like drone-proof roofing and bio-defense systems. He argued that these modernization efforts are essential for the safety of the Commander in Chief and future First Families.
“The National Trust for Historic Preservation sues me for a Ballroom that is under budget, ahead of schedule, being built at no cost to the Taxpayer, and will be the finest Building of its kind anywhere in the World,” Trump wrote.
Trump remains confident that the project will eventually be completed despite the current legal hurdle. He noted that many White House improvements have historically been handled without needing a special act from Congress.
Wyatt Matters
Americans expect leaders to protect the nation’s security and respect the taxpayers while defending the People’s House from political roadblocks.
-
Entertainment3 years agoWhoopi Goldberg’s “Wildly Inappropriate” Commentary Forces “The View” into Unscheduled Commercial Break
-
Entertainment3 years ago‘He’s A Pr*ck And F*cking Hates Republicans’: Megyn Kelly Goes Off on Don Lemon
-
Featured3 years agoUS Advises Citizens to Leave This Country ASAP
-
Featured3 years agoBenghazi Hero: Hillary Clinton is “One of the Most Disgusting Humans on Earth”
-
Latest News2 years agoNude Woman Wields Spiked Club in Daylight Venice Beach Brawl
-
Entertainment2 years agoComedy Mourns Legend Richard Lewis: A Heartfelt Farewell
-
Featured3 years agoFox News Calls Security on Donald Trump Jr. at GOP Debate [Video]
-
Latest News2 years agoSupreme Court Gift: Trump’s Trial Delayed, Election Interference Allegations Linger
Yanena Meshew
April 6, 2026 at 6:29 pm
This judge is a MORON!!!.. I am clueless as to how we Americans have gotten so many morons in high places . We must have more STUPID people as judges and as politicians than another country in the world. Pathetic. I am a voting, taxpaying American and I want that upgrade to our White House finished as soon as possible. Thank You
Bill Awalt
April 6, 2026 at 9:04 pm
These Judges should be held accountable. Obviously this one just hates Trump as no one has ever debated White House additions or rehabs. Just count him in as another asshole lib.
Burt Danby
April 10, 2026 at 12:47 pm
Yep. A terrible woke Judge. He hasn’t done much since his appointment.
1. Appointed By George W Bush: Richard Leon is a senior District Judge for the District of Columbia (Washington). He was appointed by President George W Bush in 2002.
2. Republican With DOJ Roots: He is a Republican and served in the DOJ in the Ronald Regan era. Leon served as counsel in congressional probes like Iran-Contra, October Surprise, and Whitewater.
3. A Harvard Graduate: Judge Richard Leon is a Harvard graduate, obtaining his LLM from Harvard University in 1981. Previously, he was at Holy Cross College and Suffolk Law School before.
4. Was On Obama’s Crosshairs: In 2012, he blocked Obama’s recess appointments to the NLRB as unconstitutional. Leon criticized NSA bulk phone data collection in the 2013 Obama vs Klayman case. He called it “almost Orwellian.”
5. Key In DC Handgun Case: Leon ruled against the constitutionality of D.C.’s handgun ban in 2008. It is considered a landmark Second Amendment decision, which was later affirmed by the Supreme Court.
Linda
April 17, 2026 at 3:04 pm
He was one that probably approved the basketball court that was paid for by OUR TAX DOLLARS