January 1, Kagan’s Last-Minute Attack on Supreme Court Election Rulings Backfires

Wyatt’s Take

• Justice Kagan is trying to scare voters with wild claims about democracy two weeks before midterms.
• Her attack on the Supreme Court’s election rulings shows how desperate the left is to keep power.
• Real Americans know fair elections and secure borders matter more than activist judges’ opinions.

Justice Elena Kagan just took another swing at the Supreme Court’s conservative majority.

She claims their decisions on gerrymandering, campaign finance, and the Voting Rights Act have made America more divided.

“The conservative majority’s rulings on gerrymandering, campaign finance and the Voting Rights Act have made the country more polarized,” Kagan said.

The timing is no accident.

With midterm elections just two weeks away, Kagan’s comments look more like political theater than thoughtful legal analysis.

Conservatives point out that these rulings actually restored balance after years of activist court decisions that favored Democrats.

Critics say Kagan wants to keep the old system where liberal judges could rewrite election laws from the bench.

Trump-backed candidates across the country have embraced the Supreme Court’s approach as a return to constitutional principles.

Voters in key states are expected to reward candidates who support election integrity and reject judicial overreach.

Wyatt Matters

Middle America wants elections decided by citizens at the ballot box, not by judges rewriting the rules at the last minute.