Breaking News
January 1, SHOCKING: What Alleged Kirk Assassin’s Lover Just Told Authorities

Wyatt’s Take
- Federal prosecutors just handed out immunity deals to the woman romantically linked to Charlie Kirk’s accused would-be killer — raising urgent questions about what she knows
- The suspect’s lover talked to authorities months before the alleged plot surfaced, suggesting the feds may have had early warning signs they ignored
- This immunity deal reeks of a cover-up — why are they protecting someone this close to an assassination attempt on one of America’s top conservative voices?
A woman romantically involved with the man accused of plotting to assassinate conservative leader Charlie Kirk has received limited immunity from federal prosecutors. The immunity deal allows her to testify without fear of self-incrimination — but it’s raising more questions than answers about what authorities knew and when they knew it.
The woman, identified as Twiggs, allegedly discussed the suspect, Robinson, with federal authorities as far back as April. That timeline is sending shockwaves through conservative circles, because it suggests law enforcement may have had advance knowledge of threats against Kirk months before any arrest was made.
BREAKING: Tyler Robinson’s lover Lance Twiggs given limited immunity in Charlie Kirk assassination case pic.twitter.com/YMZL0YMCIo
— Fox News US (@FoxUSNews) June 17, 2026
“Twiggs discussed Robinson with authorities back in April,”
according to court documents reviewed by multiple outlets. Why did it take so long for authorities to act? Why was Kirk left vulnerable for months while the Deep State sat on information about a credible threat to his life?
Charlie Kirk is the founder of Turning Point USA and one of the most prominent voices in the America First movement. He’s been a lightning rod for leftist rage, mobilizing millions of young conservatives and exposing the radical indoctrination happening on college campuses nationwide.
The fact that someone close to his alleged attacker is now getting immunity deals from the same Justice Department that’s been weaponized against Trump supporters is raising serious red flags. What exactly is Twiggs telling prosecutors? And why is she being protected instead of prosecuted?
Details about the alleged assassination plot remain murky, with federal authorities keeping much of the case under wraps. Robinson’s motive, background, and connections are still largely unknown to the public — convenient timing for an administration that’s been targeting conservative media figures and activists for years.
The limited immunity deal means Twiggs can testify about Robinson’s actions, statements, and plans without facing criminal charges herself for any involvement or knowledge she may have had. It’s a prosecutorial tool typically used to flip witnesses against bigger targets — but in this case, it looks more like damage control.
Conservative legal experts are demanding answers. How much did Twiggs know? How much did the FBI know? And why wasn’t Charlie Kirk warned that someone in his orbit might be planning violence?
The Biden Justice Department has spent years going after parents at school board meetings, Catholics attending Latin Mass, and peaceful January 6th protesters. Yet when it comes to protecting high-profile conservatives from actual violent threats, they seem asleep at the wheel — or worse, complicit through negligence.
Kirk himself has not publicly commented on the immunity deal, but sources close to Turning Point USA say the organization is taking the threat seriously and cooperating fully with investigators. The lack of transparency from federal law enforcement, however, is fueling suspicions that the full story isn’t being told.
Wyatt Matters
When the government hands out immunity deals to people connected to plots against conservative leaders, working Americans have every right to ask whose side law enforcement is really on. Charlie Kirk has been a champion for the forgotten men and women of this country — the folks who work hard, pay taxes, and love America. If the feds knew about threats against him and sat on that information for months, that’s not justice. That’s a betrayal of every American who believes in free speech and the right to organize politically without fear of violence. The double standard is glaring, and it’s time for answers.
-
Entertainment3 years agoWhoopi Goldberg’s “Wildly Inappropriate” Commentary Forces “The View” into Unscheduled Commercial Break
-
Entertainment2 years ago‘He’s A Pr*ck And F*cking Hates Republicans’: Megyn Kelly Goes Off on Don Lemon
-
Featured3 years agoUS Advises Citizens to Leave This Country ASAP
-
Featured3 years agoBenghazi Hero: Hillary Clinton is “One of the Most Disgusting Humans on Earth”
-
Entertainment2 years agoComedy Mourns Legend Richard Lewis: A Heartfelt Farewell
-
Latest News2 years agoNude Woman Wields Spiked Club in Daylight Venice Beach Brawl
-
Featured3 years agoFox News Calls Security on Donald Trump Jr. at GOP Debate [Video]
-
Latest News2 years agoSupreme Court Gift: Trump’s Trial Delayed, Election Interference Allegations Linger
Dennis
June 17, 2026 at 6:29 pm
This is outrageous! She told whom? When? Obviously very sad and an attack on a Religious Leader!
Jess Norris
June 17, 2026 at 6:58 pm
I’m amazed by this article! Calling a transgender person a woman?? Nothing like being politically correct. And then the section that seems to reflect that Charlie is alive? They’re obviously referring to his widow. Doesn’t anyone review articles before they’re published? It’s embarrassing.