Breaking News
January 1, Senate Confirms Trump Pick — Massive FISA Decision Looms

Wyatt’s Take
- Trump’s man Jay Clayton just got confirmed as the new top federal prosecutor in Manhattan after Tulsi Gabbard turned down the post — and he’s walking straight into a firestorm over warrantless government spying on Americans.
- Senate leadership is now moving to force a vote on Section 702 of FISA, the surveillance tool the Deep State uses to snoop on citizens without warrants — the same program that was abused to spy on Trump’s 2016 campaign.
- This confirmation comes as conservative reformers are demanding Congress shut down warrantless surveillance once and for all, while the intelligence community insists they need it to fight terrorism.
The Senate confirmed Jay Clayton as U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, filling the powerful position that Tulsi Gabbard declined after initially being tapped for the role. Clayton, a former Securities and Exchange Commission chairman under President Trump’s first term, now takes command of one of the most consequential federal prosecutor offices in the nation.
The confirmation comes at a critical moment. Senate Majority Leader John Thune is setting up a floor vote on reauthorizing Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act — the warrantless surveillance authority that allows intelligence agencies to collect communications of foreign targets, but routinely scoops up Americans’ private messages in the process.
🚨🚨 Thune's response when I asked if he thinks Jay Clayton is a good DNI pick:
"I think he's a really good pick. He's obviously very capable and competent and [has] a great record. So, my assumption is, and I would certainly hope that Democrats who are being objective about it…
— Nicole Silverio (@NicoleMSilverio) June 11, 2026
As U.S. Attorney, Jay Clayton has worked hand in glove with our intelligence agencies and counterterrorism personnel to lock up criminals who threaten our national security.
I encourage my colleagues to join me and get Mr. Clayton’s nomination over the finish line. pic.twitter.com/w0hd04bf2k
— Tom Cotton (@SenTomCotton) July 15, 2026
Section 702 has been at the center of conservative outrage since revelations that FBI officials misused the program to spy on Trump campaign advisor Carter Page. The tool lets federal agencies monitor communications without obtaining individual warrants, a practice civil libertarians on both left and right call unconstitutional.
Clayton’s confirmation gives the Southern District of New York a permanent leader as the office handles high-profile cases ranging from Wall Street fraud to international terrorism prosecutions. The Manhattan-based office has historically been involved in cases touching national security matters where FISA surveillance plays a role.
Congressional Republicans remain deeply divided on Section 702. Intelligence community veterans argue the program is essential for stopping terrorist plots and monitoring foreign adversaries. Reform advocates counter that the FBI has repeatedly violated Americans’ Fourth Amendment rights by searching the database for U.S. citizens’ communications without warrants.
“We cannot allow the intelligence agencies to continue warrantless searches of Americans’ private communications,” one conservative House member told reporters earlier this year. “This is exactly the kind of Deep State overreach President Trump has fought against.”
The Senate vote will test whether lawmakers are willing to rein in federal surveillance powers or maintain the status quo that national security officials insist keeps America safe. Previous reauthorization fights have seen unusual coalitions form between progressive Democrats and libertarian-leaning Republicans against the intelligence establishment.
Clayton’s role as U.S. Attorney won’t directly involve FISA reauthorization, but his office will likely handle prosecutions that rely on intelligence gathered under Section 702. The Southern District has been central to cases involving international terrorism, money laundering, and foreign influence operations.
Tulsi Gabbard, who withdrew from consideration for the U.S. Attorney post, has been a vocal critic of government surveillance overreach throughout her political career. Her decision to step aside opened the door for Clayton, who brings extensive experience in financial regulation and white-collar crime prosecution.
The upcoming Senate vote on Section 702 represents a crucial test of whether the Republican-controlled chamber will prioritize privacy rights or national security arguments from the intelligence community. With the program set to expire without reauthorization, the pressure is mounting on both sides.
Wyatt Matters
For too long, hardworking Americans have watched as unelected bureaucrats in Washington claim they need unlimited power to keep us safe — while using that same power to target political enemies and spy on citizens without warrants. This vote will show whether our elected representatives stand with the Constitution or with the agencies that have abused our trust. The folks back home who pay the bills and follow the rules deserve leaders who will protect their privacy, not excuse away government overreach in the name of fighting threats the Deep State won’t even tell us about.
-
Entertainment3 years agoWhoopi Goldberg’s “Wildly Inappropriate” Commentary Forces “The View” into Unscheduled Commercial Break
-
Entertainment3 years ago‘He’s A Pr*ck And F*cking Hates Republicans’: Megyn Kelly Goes Off on Don Lemon
-
Featured3 years agoUS Advises Citizens to Leave This Country ASAP
-
Featured3 years agoBenghazi Hero: Hillary Clinton is “One of the Most Disgusting Humans on Earth”
-
Latest News2 years agoNude Woman Wields Spiked Club in Daylight Venice Beach Brawl
-
Entertainment2 years agoComedy Mourns Legend Richard Lewis: A Heartfelt Farewell
-
Featured3 years agoFox News Calls Security on Donald Trump Jr. at GOP Debate [Video]
-
Latest News2 years agoSupreme Court Gift: Trump’s Trial Delayed, Election Interference Allegations Linger
Kenneth Troup
July 29, 2026 at 9:08 pm
There is a difference between Director of National Intelligence (DNI) and a US Attorney. What Clayton got appointed to was DNI not the US Attorney. You should correct that.