Breaking News
January 1, GOP Lawmaker Moves to RESTORE Original Constitution Provision — Democrats Panicking

Wyatt’s Take
- Texas conservative introduces resolution to repeal the 17th Amendment and return Senate elections to state legislatures — exactly how the Founders intended it
- Nine GOP House members co-sign the measure to restore constitutional balance and crush D.C. swamp power
- Democrats terrified because this would END their stranglehold on Senate races bought with coastal elite cash
Republican lawmakers are making a bold move to restore the Constitution to its original design — and the establishment is losing its mind.
Texas Rep. Keith Self has introduced a joint resolution to repeal the 17th Amendment, which would return the power to elect U.S. senators back to state legislatures where it belonged for over a century. Nine GOP House members have already signed on as co-sponsors.
The 17th Amendment, ratified in 1913, changed the game by mandating direct election of senators by popular vote. Before that, state legislatures appointed senators — giving states real representation in Washington and preventing the kind of D.C. insider corruption we see today.
Self’s resolution would turn back the clock to the Founders’ vision: state legislatures picking senators who actually answer to their states, not to out-of-state mega-donors and special interests.
The original constitutional framework gave each state two senators appointed by state legislatures. This created a true federalist system where senators represented state governments, not just voters swayed by millions in campaign cash from California and New York.
Republicans argue the 17th Amendment destroyed the balance of power between states and the federal government. It turned the Senate into just another popularity contest flooded with dark money and coastal elite influence.
By returning to state legislature appointments, senators would be directly accountable to their state governments — the people who actually know what their communities need. No more campaigns funded by Silicon Valley billionaires or Hollywood activists.
Democrats are already freaking out because they know what this means: their stranglehold on Senate seats bought with unlimited out-of-state money would crumble overnight.
The resolution faces an uphill battle. Repealing a constitutional amendment requires a two-thirds vote in both chambers of Congress and ratification by three-fourths of state legislatures.
But the fact that nearly a dozen House Republicans are willing to put their names on this shows how serious constitutional conservatives are about draining the swamp and restoring federalism.
Wyatt Matters
This isn’t about turning back the clock — it’s about getting back to what actually worked. The Founders knew that senators needed to answer to their states, not to whoever could raise the most money from Manhattan and San Francisco. State legislatures know their communities better than some consultant in D.C. ever will. Restoring the original design would give working Americans real representation again, not just whoever the billionaire class decides to bankroll.
-
Entertainment3 years agoWhoopi Goldberg’s “Wildly Inappropriate” Commentary Forces “The View” into Unscheduled Commercial Break
-
Entertainment3 years ago‘He’s A Pr*ck And F*cking Hates Republicans’: Megyn Kelly Goes Off on Don Lemon
-
Featured3 years agoUS Advises Citizens to Leave This Country ASAP
-
Featured3 years agoBenghazi Hero: Hillary Clinton is “One of the Most Disgusting Humans on Earth”
-
Latest News2 years agoNude Woman Wields Spiked Club in Daylight Venice Beach Brawl
-
Entertainment2 years agoComedy Mourns Legend Richard Lewis: A Heartfelt Farewell
-
Featured3 years agoFox News Calls Security on Donald Trump Jr. at GOP Debate [Video]
-
Latest News2 years agoSupreme Court Gift: Trump’s Trial Delayed, Election Interference Allegations Linger
Jon
July 4, 2026 at 6:05 pm
Drain the swamp
Ardvark
July 5, 2026 at 7:19 am
With the apparent democrat party approach to elections, they could ensure every time that the most ideological leaning individual gets into office!
Denni
July 4, 2026 at 6:21 pm
Extremely logical law which abides by the 17th Amendment yet destroys the Democratic, inside the beltway Democrativ Political Money Grab!. SORRY, the law matters and your complaints are a scam!
ROBERT LEE BRAGG, JR
July 4, 2026 at 6:48 pm
SOUNDS LIKE A GREAT IDEA, IT SHOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN CHANGED. IT WILL BE A UPHILL BATTLE TO CORRECT THE LAW BUT WORTH IT IF WE SUCCEED!!
James Mercogliano
July 4, 2026 at 6:54 pm
I live in the peoples republic of Massachusetts and there is no way that i want the foolish Democrat legislature picking who i can have as a US Senator at least if we have a Republican Governor and we happen to lose our represented Senator the Republican Governor can pick a Republican Senator to replace that person who held that Seat.
GomeznSA
July 4, 2026 at 8:52 pm
I did a bit of searching as to why the 17th was enacted. The ‘best’ answer seems to be that it would ‘help’ to strengthen ‘democracy’. Seems to me that by doing that it weakens our Constitutional Representative Republic in favor of what is essentially a popularity contest.
Mark Hendricks
July 5, 2026 at 8:38 pm
It would help strengthen the democracy but they the. Began enacting laws to where they could become instant millionaires. Then they enacted laws where they could get even richer and richer
Eileen
July 4, 2026 at 10:57 pm
YES! Repeal the 17th. Senators represent the State. Representatives represent the people. So,YES! Repeal the 17th so the Senators are selected by the legislative bodies of the state.
Jonathan T Baker
July 5, 2026 at 8:53 am
IDK if reverting back to having Senators chosen by State Legislators will be any better that what we experience today. Do research into why the change was made in the first place. I believe that until lobbying is made illegal, the problems of monied influence will not go away and it won’t matter the method of selection of Senators, it’s still going to be messy. Lobbying that involves payment of monies is legal bribery in my opinion. I question if Senators who are not direct recipients of lobbying efforts will be any more removed from pet viewpoints than those today. Perhaps changing back to the method of selecting Senators prior to 1913 might shake up the existing political lobbying for a while, and that might be a good thing. But, I don’t see it lasting forever.
OGFounders
July 5, 2026 at 9:01 pm
Our Founding Fathers were geniuses. The 17th Amendment should never have been created.
Back to the original vision of our Founding Fathers NOW
Juan
July 8, 2026 at 10:37 am
This is an EXCELLENT idea…Big Hollywood and NYC liberal money shouldn’t decide who the Senator from Louisiana should be. I hope the GOP has the stones to push this to it’s rightful conclusion but I’m not counting on them….to many are feckless RINOs.