Breaking News
January 1, Federal Judge BLOCKS ICE From Making Arrests — Leftist Lawfare Targets Trump Deportation
Wyatt’s Take
- A New York judge just handed sanctuary city activists a major win, barring ICE from most arrests at immigration courts across NYC
- The ruling comes after leftist groups filed lawsuits to shield illegal aliens from federal enforcement — even at the courthouse door
- This is exactly the kind of judicial sabotage that makes it nearly impossible to enforce immigration law and protect American communities
A federal judge in New York City has delivered a crushing blow to immigration enforcement, blocking ICE agents from making most arrests at immigration courts throughout the city. The decision follows coordinated legal action from multiple activist organizations determined to undermine deportation efforts.
The ruling severely restricts Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations at the very locations where immigration cases are adjudicated. Now, illegal aliens with active deportation proceedings can show up to court knowing federal agents have been handcuffed by judicial decree.
Breaking News: A judge largely barred federal agents from making arrests in immigration courts in New York City. https://t.co/MtA2L64dNX
— The New York Times (@nytimes) May 19, 2026
“This decision creates dangerous sanctuary zones right where immigration law is supposed to be enforced,” one immigration enforcement advocate explained. “It’s lawfare, plain and simple — using the courts to override federal authority and protect people who broke our laws to get here.”
The lawsuit was brought by several left-wing organizations that have made it their mission to obstruct deportation enforcement. They argued that ICE presence at courthouses has a “chilling effect” on illegal aliens seeking legal representation or showing up for hearings.
But critics say that’s exactly backward. Immigration courts exist to process cases and execute the law — not to serve as safe havens for those evading deportation orders.
The ruling comes as the Trump administration has ramped up interior enforcement nationwide. ICE has dramatically increased worksite raids, sanctuary city operations, and courthouse arrests as part of a broader effort to restore immigration law and order.
Activist groups have responded with an all-out legal assault in friendly jurisdictions like New York, hoping sympathetic judges will tie the hands of federal enforcement. And in this case, they succeeded.
“What we’re seeing is a two-tiered system,” said one former ICE official. “In red states, we can do our jobs. In blue cities, judges and local politicians create obstruction at every turn — even when it means protecting violent criminals and repeat border crossers.”
New York City has long been a hub of sanctuary policies, with local officials refusing to cooperate with ICE detainers and警告 illegal aliens about pending raids. This latest court ruling takes that defiance to a new level, creating legal cover for non-cooperation.
The decision affects all five boroughs and applies to immigration courts where thousands of cases are heard each year. ICE agents will now face severe restrictions on when and where they can execute arrest warrants — even for individuals with final deportation orders.
Legal experts say the ruling is likely to be appealed, and could eventually make its way to higher courts. But in the meantime, it hands a major tactical victory to open-borders advocates and creates a significant enforcement gap in one of America’s largest cities.
Why It Matters
This isn’t just about New York. It’s about whether activist judges in sanctuary cities can unilaterally create zones where federal immigration law doesn’t apply. Every ruling like this makes it harder to secure the border, enforce deportations, and protect American workers and communities. When courts start shielding illegal aliens from lawful arrest at the very buildings where immigration cases are decided, we’ve lost control of our own sovereignty.
-
Entertainment3 years agoWhoopi Goldberg’s “Wildly Inappropriate” Commentary Forces “The View” into Unscheduled Commercial Break
-
Entertainment2 years ago‘He’s A Pr*ck And F*cking Hates Republicans’: Megyn Kelly Goes Off on Don Lemon
-
Featured3 years agoUS Advises Citizens to Leave This Country ASAP
-
Featured3 years agoBenghazi Hero: Hillary Clinton is “One of the Most Disgusting Humans on Earth”
-
Entertainment2 years agoComedy Mourns Legend Richard Lewis: A Heartfelt Farewell
-
Latest News2 years agoNude Woman Wields Spiked Club in Daylight Venice Beach Brawl
-
Featured3 years agoFox News Calls Security on Donald Trump Jr. at GOP Debate [Video]
-
Latest News2 years agoSupreme Court Gift: Trump’s Trial Delayed, Election Interference Allegations Linger
George Worton
May 19, 2026 at 6:09 pm
The judge will be violating Federal law and should be reviewed by a Federal court…..this is why thinking Americans are fed up with woke BS
Cesar Gimenez
May 19, 2026 at 6:10 pm
How utterly wrong.US laws certainly apply in courts.Thefederal judge should be removed from office
Michael Richno
May 19, 2026 at 6:24 pm
Curious why “ 警告” (which is Chinese for “warn”) appears in the text.
From the article”
“New York City has long been a hub of sanctuary policies, with local officials refusing to cooperate with ICE detainers and警告 illegal aliens about pending raids”.
DENNIS
May 19, 2026 at 6:29 pm
Absolute liberal contempt for the “LAW” and the US Constitution! You should be impeached!
Steve
May 19, 2026 at 6:43 pm
Why is this article protecting the Judge’s name? If a Judge is making a call outside the law, their name should be published. The judges that do this should be put in jail!
Jon
May 19, 2026 at 6:46 pm
Just another corrupt bought and paid for democrat meat puppet
Lisa
May 19, 2026 at 7:00 pm
These Un-American judges need to have consequences that includes jail/prison time. So tired of these scumbags putting criminal illegals over American citizens.
Diaz
May 19, 2026 at 7:03 pm
Deport ! The federal judge has not the ability to enforce decisions.
Lynn Macfarland
May 19, 2026 at 7:19 pm
Quite right! If you were going to court fully expecting due process and see others doing the same are arrested, would you show up?
Trump said he would go after violent criminals. He is going after otherwise law abiding people. People who are going to renew/ extend residency or plea for asylum. If a person supports him, their drug offenses are overlooked. He is just as ‘woke’ as long as it benefits him.
At least the justice department is equally supporting people.
Peeved
May 19, 2026 at 7:42 pm
Any one who entered the USA illegally or has broken our laws while here “legally” is a criminal. If they are at Immigration Court they are receiving “due process” and if deportation is what is their determination then it means that must leave/deport out of America. Yes, Trump wants the violent criminals out first but if ICE comes across any illegals they have the power to arrest and take them in and deport them. Any illegal or law breaker even if here legally is a criminal and subject to deportation.
Nunya
May 19, 2026 at 8:25 pm
No blow at all to deportations. Might be that some jurists have not read immigration law or recent SC decisions. It will be over ruled and the judges should be sanctioned. This lawfare is costing the Country money. And part of the sanctions should be fines hefty enough to pay back the cost of the problems they have caused by delaying the law being enforced. That actually is chargeable under immigration law!!! And in most cases the law states “ANY PERSON”!
Grammy Leslie
May 19, 2026 at 8:43 pm
Build a wall around NYC to keep all the illegals in.