Breaking News
January 1, Century Behind Bars: America’s Oldest Prisoner Dies After EIGHT Death Row Escapes

Wyatt’s Take
- A man spent 76 years locked up for a murder he swore he didn’t commit — dying at 101 without ever getting a fair shot at proving his innocence
- Eight times they strapped him in for execution, eight times something stopped it — even the cop who arrested him later said he wasn’t sure this man was even there
- The other suspect took a plea deal after police allegedly beat him into fingering Smith, then recanted everything — but our justice system let an innocent man rot anyway
Francis Clifford Smith died in his sleep this past June at a Connecticut nursing facility. He was 101 years old. He’d spent nearly eight decades behind bars for a crime that even the arresting officer eventually doubted he committed.
Smith was just 25 when Connecticut sentenced him to death for shooting Grover Hart, a 68-year-old night watchman at a yacht club, during a botched robbery in July 1949. The state scheduled his execution eight separate times over the years. Each time, something intervened.
“Essentially, he died of old age,” David Skoczulek, spokesman for 60 West — the secured facility where Smith spent his final days — told reporters. “He had very limited family involvement around his passing but we assured it was appropriate, met his wishes and was dignified.”
Smith was cremated without a funeral. No family. No ceremony. Just a quiet end to America’s longest prison sentence.
The case against Smith was shaky from the start. Authorities arrested two men for Hart’s killing. The other suspect, George Lowden, cut a deal with prosecutors and initially pointed the finger at Smith. But Lowden later claimed police had beaten that statement out of him and refused to testify against Smith at trial.
Over seven decades, the evidence crumbled. A key witness recanted her story linking Smith to the crime. Lowden repudiated his earlier statement. Another convict serving time in Alabama even confessed that he — not Smith — had been involved in Hart’s murder.
“I’m not even sure he was present at the murder,” Major Leo Carroll testified to the Board of Pardons right before Smith’s eighth scheduled execution. Carroll was one of the officers who had interrogated Smith after his arrest.
Despite all this, Smith never got a new trial. A judge reviewed the Alabama convict’s confession and rejected it as not credible. Smith’s murder conviction stood.
“I’m in here on no evidence at all,” Smith told reporters in 2023, still maintaining his innocence after more than seven decades behind bars.
Connecticut commuted Smith’s death sentence to life in prison in 1954. He served 76 years total, with only three brief periods of freedom. In 1967, he escaped and stayed on the run for 12 days before being recaptured.
Then in 1975, the state granted him parole. He stayed free for about 10 months before being arrested on larceny and weapons charges. Connecticut sent him back to prison for violating parole, though records show he was never convicted of those charges.
Smith declined or refused to participate in several later parole efforts, though he later disputed this and said he couldn’t remember. But in 2020 — at age 96 — he finally agreed to supervised parole at the nursing facility where he would die four years later.
He reportedly suffered from dementia at the end. Connecticut’s Department of Correction wouldn’t confirm the diagnosis but acknowledged Smith was dealing with issues related to old age.
“He was 101 and a half,” Andrius Banevicius, public information officer for Connecticut’s Department of Correction, said. “He did pretty well as far as longevity is concerned.”
Wyatt Matters
This isn’t about being soft on crime. This is about a system that locked up a young man based on a coerced confession from a co-defendant who later recanted, kept him caged while witnesses changed their stories and other suspects confessed, and never gave him a real chance to prove what even his arresting officer came to doubt. Seventy-six years. That’s not justice — that’s a warning about what happens when the machinery of government cares more about closing cases than finding truth. We demand law and order, but we also demand it be the right order, based on real evidence. Francis Clifford Smith deserved better than dying alone in a prison nursing home, still swearing his innocence after three-quarters of a century.
-
Entertainment3 years agoWhoopi Goldberg’s “Wildly Inappropriate” Commentary Forces “The View” into Unscheduled Commercial Break
-
Entertainment3 years ago‘He’s A Pr*ck And F*cking Hates Republicans’: Megyn Kelly Goes Off on Don Lemon
-
Featured3 years agoUS Advises Citizens to Leave This Country ASAP
-
Featured3 years agoBenghazi Hero: Hillary Clinton is “One of the Most Disgusting Humans on Earth”
-
Latest News3 years agoNude Woman Wields Spiked Club in Daylight Venice Beach Brawl
-
Featured3 years agoFox News Calls Security on Donald Trump Jr. at GOP Debate [Video]
-
Entertainment3 years agoComedy Mourns Legend Richard Lewis: A Heartfelt Farewell
-
Latest News3 years agoSupreme Court Gift: Trump’s Trial Delayed, Election Interference Allegations Linger
Ephraim Ponce
August 21, 2026 at 6:24 am
All these Islamist murderers and other illegal alien murderers protected by judges and set free, and this poor man spent his life locked away with little or no evidence against him. If this had happened today, he would have been let free quickly, but because it happened long ago, he continued to be persecuted and locked away. It is also a reason why we need to go much slower with the death penalty.
Steve
August 21, 2026 at 10:23 am
If we went any slower with the death penalty, there would be no death penalty!! It’s a sad story if it’s true of him being innocent. However, 90% of murderers all say they are innocent. Unfortunately, we have too many DA’s and government agents that resemble those corrupt criminals like Comey, Christopher Wray, Muller, that put innocent people in prison just to pump up their records.
Jon
August 21, 2026 at 6:59 pm
Truth they coukd have save alot of money keeping this fool alive
Adella Garwood
August 21, 2026 at 6:41 am
That’s horrible. That poor man.
Phil
August 21, 2026 at 10:08 am
I call BULLSHIT on “our system letting a man rot away!” There was 70+ years to vindicate his innocence and that never happened.
Now the left-winged, pro-bullshit media has a chance to jump all over “our system.” This same US based system sure helps with FREE SHIT when everyone else needs it, doesn’t it???
Eileen
August 21, 2026 at 11:55 am
This is one very sad story of how our “justice” system failed a Black person over 70+ years of his life. There are many others who have similar stories, but maybe not as bad, but his deserves to be publicized big-time and shown in the education of those who want to become State attorneys who prosecute criminal cases.
Jon
August 21, 2026 at 7:01 pm
Of course always pull the race card there are innocent people of all races incarcerated that didn’t do the crime. He had appeals denied.
Jon
August 21, 2026 at 7:04 pm
Of course pull the race card. People of all races are in jail and could be innocent. He had yearscof apesls what happened.
CL
August 22, 2026 at 9:29 am
Ummm he wasn’t black! Why the author decided to use a stock photo of someone instead of using the real man, who was a white man, one only knows. It just takes a teeny tiny little bit of research tto verify! Of course, perhaps the writer was hoping for a racial “comment war” to break out 🙄
madmemere
August 21, 2026 at 8:10 pm
Sad waste of a human life; who knows what he might have contributed to society if he had been allowed to prove his own innocence.
Jim Dowdell
September 3, 2026 at 11:24 am
For many years I supported the death penalty. Today, I no longer trust the criminal justice enterprise to always get it right in sentencing people to death. I strongly advocate what I call: “The spontaneous death sentence” which is the right to use deadly force to stop a potntially deadly assault. But, once a threat has been mitigated, a death sentence imposed ten, twenty or thirty years later is unwarranted. With all of the taxpayer funded litigation that follows a death sentence it is almost always less costly to incarcerate the accused than to execute them. The primary beneficiaries of our current death sentence process are those reap the rewards of litigation.