Connect with us

Latest News

January 1, Supreme Court Decision Impacts Future of Ghost Guns

Published

on

Well folks, get ready for some news that might make you shake your head. The Supreme Court decided, by a 7-2 vote, to keep the rules against “ghost guns” just like the Biden administration wants.

Back in April 2022, President Biden and his team at the Department of Justice put out a rule to control these ghost guns. What are they exactly? They’re gun kits that you can buy online or in a shop and build yourself at home. They don’t have serial numbers, and you don’t need a background check to get them. The government wants these kits to be treated like regular guns.

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) last year said these kits should follow the Gun Control Act from 1968. This Act is supposed to regulate weapons, and now even these kits are a part of it. But some folks, including gun makers, aren’t happy and challenged this, saying the law from 1968 wasn’t meant to handle parts and kits.

The Supreme Court, however, said the ATF can do what it’s doing because times have changed. In 1968, you needed expensive gear to build a gun, but with technology like 3D printing now, it’s much easier.

Now, Justice Clarence Thomas and Justice Samuel Alito disagreed with this decision. They think the government is overreaching. Thomas says, “The government asked us before to change the law just so they could control semi-automatic weapons, and we said no. Now they want us to do it again for gun kits, and this time the Court said yes. I wouldn’t have done that.” He believes these kits don’t fit the law’s definition of a firearm, and the Court made mistakes in their decision.

It seems like more government control over guns, and that’s always a big concern for those who care about their Second Amendment rights.

Wyatt Matters!

The Supreme Court’s choice to keep the rules against ghost guns is important because it helps keep people safe. Ghost guns are kits that let you make a gun at home, and you don’t need a background check for them. Without serial numbers, these guns can easily fall into the wrong hands. Treating them like regular guns means there will be more checks to make sure only responsible people get them. It’s a step to prevent people from using these kits for bad reasons and helps protect our communities.

Some people think the decision is unfair because the rules were made to control finished guns, not kits. They believe that the law from 1968 wasn’t supposed to cover parts and that this is too much government control. This is especially true for people who worry about their rights to own guns as stated in the Second Amendment. But times are different now, and it’s much easier to make a gun with new technology, like 3D printers. Even though technology makes it easier, the main goal is to keep everyone safe and secure.

While there might be disagreements about what the government should do, keeping the rules shows that safety is a big priority. It’s important to balance people’s rights with the need to make sure guns are used responsibly and that dangerous people don’t get them. By treating these kits like other guns, the aim is to have more control and therefore fewer problems. It’s about finding the best way to make sure everyone feels safe in their cities and neighborhoods.

As our loyal readers, we encourage you to share your thoughts and opinions on this issue. Let your voice be heard and join the discussion below.

Source

8 Comments

  1. Stella

    March 26, 2025 at 6:16 pm

    They have too much control now. Not in favor of this control. I do not own a ghost gun maker, but I know people who do.

  2. Jim

    March 27, 2025 at 2:56 am

    I am intrigued by the author’s statement: “It’s about finding the best way to make sure everyone feels safe in their cities and neighborhoods.” The key phrase being “… make sure everyone FEELS safe…”. Is that the true intention of our laws, to “FEEL” safe, as opposed to “BE’ safe? It is my belief that the extended reach of this law will NOT allow the average person to FEEL safe because they know that the criminals ignore the laws, still have the guns, and will not be deterred by this law either.

    It is unfair to punish law abiding citizens in oder to simply hope that people FEEL safer. Pass laws that definitively disarm the criminals, not the law abiding citizens.

  3. Sidney Bostian

    March 27, 2025 at 5:15 am

    Which word of “Shall not infringe” can’t SCOTUS and all other governments understand?

    • Dennis

      March 27, 2025 at 2:59 pm

      Shall NOT infringe

  4. TruePatriot49

    March 27, 2025 at 8:30 am

    Several justices on the Supreme Court are,IMHO, compromised. If the entire Jeffrey Epstein black book is published we may have proof. The communist Democrats need gun confiscation so they can takeover and rule forever. These compromised justices just do what they are told to do, the Constitution be damned.

  5. Vetmike

    March 27, 2025 at 9:01 am

    Hmm, so when does this take effect?
    Let’s push the absurdity even further. No home made knives, baseball bats, tire rons or any other object ca;able of being used in self defense. The history of ‘home made’ guns that were never given seriel numbers is a lot older than any act or law demanding seriel numbers.
    Again the SCOTUS makes a decision sp contrary to he Constitution that one wonders.

  6. Michael D Houst

    March 27, 2025 at 3:22 pm

    Time to fire up the milling machine and the lathe and turn out a half dozen serial numberless guns.
    And if I just give them away, there isn’t a damn thing the government can say about it.

  7. Common Sense?

    March 27, 2025 at 7:54 pm

    “Those who surrender freedom for security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one.”
    — Benjamin Franklin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

8 Comments


Wyatt Porter is a seasoned writer and constitutional scholar who brings a rugged authenticity and deep-seated patriotism to his work. Born and raised in small-town America, Wyatt grew up on a farm, where he learned the value of hard work and the pride that comes from it. As a conservative voice, he writes with the insight of a historian and the grit of a lifelong laborer, blending logic with a sharp wit. Wyatt’s work captures the struggles and triumphs of everyday Americans, offering readers a fresh perspective grounded in traditional values, individual freedom, and an unwavering love for his country.




Trending