Latest News
January 1, NYC Mayor Hopefuls Trade Blows at Fiery Debate
Wyatt’s Take
- The safety of city streets became the biggest fight of the night, as Mamdani’s record got picked apart.
- The candidates offered sharp words over rent prices, experience, and their plans to fix housing.
- Polls show Mamdani ahead, but his lead is shrinking fast with election day coming up quick.
New York City’s mayoral hopefuls squared off in a heated debate Thursday, with public safety and policing drawing the fiercest exchanges. Mamdani’s calls to defund the police drew heavy fire from his opponents.
“He believes in defunding the police, disarming the police, disbanding the police. That’s who he is.”
Cuomo said.
Mamdani tried to separate himself from his earlier statements, claiming they were from years ago.
When talk shifted to the cost of living, Mamdani pushed for a rent freeze, but Cuomo shot back.
“Freeze the rent only postpones the rent.”
Sliwa and Cuomo both warned the plan would hurt housing in the city.
Questions of experience also dominated.
“This is not a job for a first timer… he’s literally never had a job.”
Cuomo said.
“Thank God I’m not a professional politician because they have helped create this crime crisis in the city that we face.”
Sliwa added.
“What I don’t have in experience, I make up for in integrity. What you don’t have in integrity, you could never make up for in experience.”
Mamdani fired back.
With less than three weeks to go before New Yorkers vote, polls show Mamdani ahead but dropping—his 46% support is slipping as Cuomo gains ground. Sliwa stands in third, making noise about law and order.
The campaign trail is heating up over big heartland issues like crime, affordable homes, and trust in leaders. Even though Mamdani drew an endorsement from the current governor, national party bosses have stayed quiet.
This race, driven by regular people’s concerns, is far from decided.
Heartland Americans know what matters: safe neighborhoods and leaders who put the people first. That’s the lesson coming out of this New York debate.
Wyatt Matters
When the elites argue over who should run the city, working people watch closely to see who will actually stand up for their safety, wallets, and their future. Commonsense values like honesty and hard work are what decide elections—and that’s what matters for us all.

-
Entertainment2 years ago
Whoopi Goldberg’s “Wildly Inappropriate” Commentary Forces “The View” into Unscheduled Commercial Break
-
Entertainment2 years ago
‘He’s A Pr*ck And F*cking Hates Republicans’: Megyn Kelly Goes Off on Don Lemon
-
Featured2 years ago
US Advises Citizens to Leave This Country ASAP
-
Featured2 years ago
Benghazi Hero: Hillary Clinton is “One of the Most Disgusting Humans on Earth”
-
Entertainment2 years ago
Comedy Mourns Legend Richard Lewis: A Heartfelt Farewell
-
Featured2 years ago
Fox News Calls Security on Donald Trump Jr. at GOP Debate [Video]
-
Latest News2 years ago
Nude Woman Wields Spiked Club in Daylight Venice Beach Brawl
-
Latest News2 years ago
Supreme Court Gift: Trump’s Trial Delayed, Election Interference Allegations Linger
Leslie
October 17, 2025 at 11:07 am
There’s enough stupid voters that will vote for Mamdani just because of the word “free”. There’s many more that will vote for him just out of curiosity and nothing more. Kind of like “trying him on for size”. If elected, say goodbye to NYC. There will be a mass exodus with some citizens and total chaos with many of the remaining ones. There won’t be any police because Mamdani will have defunded them. Real estate will go on the market in droves, especially rentals because Mamdani plans on rent-free housing. Who would be expected to foot the bill except for property owners? Taxes will be raised sky high – even higher than the ridiculous taxes in NY now. People wouldn’t be able to afford to live in Mamdani’s “free” NYC. Many young people (and some adults) are clueless about economy and how it works. Economy and civics should be mandatory in high school.