January 1, Clinton, FBI, And The Real Russia Hoax

Wyatt’s Take

• America witnessed the Clinton-FBI plot against Trump unfold in plain sight
• Newly released intel confirms Clinton’s team dreamed up the Russia collusion smear
• The FBI and media doubled down, fueling an anti-Trump lie that fooled the public

Sometimes the truth is right in front of us. We didn’t need any classified annex or secret briefing to know what Hillary Clinton and Washington insiders were up to back in 2016. Their scheme to paint Donald Trump as a Russian puppet played out, out in the open, as the country watched.

After new intelligence came out showing the Clinton campaign planned the Russia collusion hoax and used the FBI to push it, the so-called experts in the legacy press wasted no time twisting the story. Even The New York Times and Washington Post tried to cover it up, claiming the intel was ignored or investigated properly. But the cold, hard facts tell a different story—one that lines up with exactly what we remember happening in real-time.

The newly revealed CIA notes show that Hillary Clinton okayed a plan to “vilify” Trump by linking him to Russia and relied on the FBI to push the fake story. This plot was brought right up the food chain—to Obama, CIA chief Brennan, and FBI boss Comey. But none of them blew the whistle. Instead, they played along, helping Clinton’s dirty trick become the hottest topic in Washington.

Evidence from Clinton world’s own emails lays out the plot. In late July 2016, Soros Foundation exec Leonard Benardo reportedly spelled it out: “Julie says it will be a long-term affair to demonize Putin and Trump.” He added, “Later the FBI will put more oil into the fire.” And sure enough, within a week, the bureau launched its infamous Crossfire Hurricane investigation.

Another email from Benardo claims, “HRC approved Julia’s idea about Trump and Russian hackers hampering U.S. elections. That should distract people from her own missing email.” The plan was as much to hide Clinton’s own scandals as to hurt Trump.

When there wasn’t a shred of real evidence, Clinton’s team brought in friendly tech outfits like CrowdStrike to back up their story for the media. It wasn’t about facts—it was about headlines.

In June 2016, The Washington Post published the infamous story pushing the Russian hack narrative, quoting CrowdStrike execs. But when those same execs had to testify under oath, they admitted, “didn’t have direct evidence” of anything being taken from the DNC. As one of them put it, “we just don’t have the evidence that says it actually left.” Yet the press ran with every baseless claim, and America got played.

Meanwhile, as the plot unfolded, the Clinton camp lawyer Michael Sussmann strolled into the FBI with made-up stories about Trump and Russian banks—stuff the bureau knew was bogus but still chased. Same time, ex-British spy Christopher Steele, paid by Clinton through a subcontractor, was feeding more falsehoods to the FBI, and campaign manager Robbie Mook was on TV blaming Russia for the DNC leaks. All the puzzle pieces lined up just how the CIA memo described.

And when the scheme needed a boost, CrowdStrike would hype its “proof” of Russian hacking, only to point back to government reports built on CrowdStrike’s own claims. Talk about circular logic—and the public got caught in the spin cycle.

Even more telling? CrowdStrike’s leaders had deep links to Democrats and political groups: Dmitri Alperovitch was tight with Ukraine activists and Beltway think tanks, while Shawn Henry was a longtime FBI leader. The Clinton team’s lawyer, Sussmann, was the one who brought CrowdStrike into the DNC mess to begin with, keeping everything in the family—all while a willing media spread their talking points with no questions asked.

This wasn’t just politicking. It was a full-scale operation to control a presidential election, using government power and a complicit press to fool the public. And while politicians and elites yawned, regular Americans were left holding the bag, wondering why no one ever seems to pay a price in Washington.

Wyatt Matters

This story isn’t just about old news or Washington drama. It’s a warning for every heartland family who still believes in honest elections and the rule of law. If powerful folks can spin lies into “truth” and weaponize government to chase their enemies, then none of us are safe from the next dirty trick. Middle America deserves better—honesty, fairness, and leaders who serve the people, not their own ambitions.

Source